A balanced immune response after cardiac injury is crucial to successful heart regeneration, but knowledge of what distinguishes a regenerative from a scarring response is still limited. The Mexican cavefish Astyanax mexicanus provides a unique comparative model to study heart regeneration and scarring within a single species. Astyanax surface-dwelling fish are capable of heart regeneration, whereas, like the human heart, their cave-dwelling Pachón counterparts form a permanent scar. Using single-cell transcriptomics and immune perturbations, we identify two distinct and largely sequential immune mechanisms driving regeneration in surface fish. First, late-present macrophages are actively phagocytic, and pharmacological inhibition of phagocytosis disrupts scar clearance and regeneration. Second, B cells recruited from 7 days post-injury promote cardiomyocyte cell progression into mitosis, and their inhibition with Acalabrutinib significantly impairs cardiomyocyte proliferation and regeneration. This B cell-dependent mechanism is conserved in zebrafish. Our findings reveal two independent late immune mechanisms distinguishing regenerative from non-regenerative cardiac repair, offering insights for potential therapeutic strategies to enhance heart regeneration in mammals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sengul et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: