Key result
Protective ventilation with individualized PEEP and recruitment is linked to negligible intraoperative hemodynamic impact.
Why the study?
The effect of recruiting maneuver and individualized PEEP on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with healthy lungs during abdominal surgery was not well established.
Does individualized protective ventilation with recruiting maneuvers affect intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with healthy lungs during upper abdominal surgery?
Observational (n=47)
Does individualized protective ventilation with recruiting maneuvers affect intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with healthy lungs during upper abdominal surgery?
Individualized protective ventilation with recruiting maneuvers has a negligible negative effect on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients with healthy lungs undergoing abdominal surgery.
Negligible hemodynamic effects may support individualized protective ventilation in abdominal surgery; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of recruiting maneuver (RM) and individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the parameters of intraoperative hemodynamic in patients with healthy lungs during upper abdominal surgery. The group included 47 patients aged ≥18 years with an ARISCAT score of ≥26. Protective ventilation in volume-control mode was used intraoperative. Ventilation parameters: tidal volume 7 ml/ kg of ideal body weight; FiO2 – ≥40% to maintain SpO2 ≥93%; inhalation/exhalation ratio – 1: 2; respiratory rate – determined by the value of CO2 at the end of exhalation (EtCO2) 35-37 mm Hg, Pplat ≤17 cm Hg, Pdrive ≤13 cm Hg, the level of PEEP was selected individually. RM was performed immediately after orotracheal intubation and then if it was necessary. During the operation standard hemodynamic monitoring was performed and central hemodynamic parameters were studied. The cardiac output and cardiac index were assessment before and after the recruiting maneuver (RM), as well as every half hour during surgery, using an impedance cardiography module based on measurement of thoracic bioelectric impedance. The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia was established intraoperative. Statistical processing of the obtained data was performed using the programs “Microsoft Excel 2013” and “Statistica for Windows 6.0”. The results of the study showed that under conditions of protective mechanical ventilation using RM and positive end expiratory pressure, there is some circulatory depression, but the negative effect on intraoperative hemodynamic is negligible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuzmenko et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy lungs during upper abdominal surgery (n=47). Recruiting maneuver (RM) and individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was evaluated on Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters (cardiac output, cardiac index, incidence of hypotension and bradycardia). Protective mechanical ventilation using recruiting maneuvers and individualized PEEP caused negligible negative effects on intraoperative hemodynamics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: