Key result
Combined PECS I and II blocks provide safe, extensive single-puncture anesthesia for cardiac device implantation.
Why the study?
Appropriate analgesia and sedation during cardiac device implantation are crucial, and the combined use of PECS I and PECS II blocks may offer advantages for thoracic wall anesthesia.
Does the combination of PECS I and PECS II blocks improve analgesia and reduce opioid needs in patients undergoing cardiac device implantation?
Does the combination of PECS I and PECS II blocks improve analgesia and reduce opioid needs in patients undergoing cardiac device implantation?
The combination of PECS I and PECS II blocks is a promising regional anesthesia technique for cardiac device implantation that may reduce opioid use and improve patient comfort.
Regional blocks may aid analgesia for CIED implantation; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and pacemakers are used to treat advanced systolic heart failure, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and bradyarrhythmia. Over the past ten years, there has been a notable rise in the number of cardiac implanted electronic device implants because of mounting evidence of better survival and quality of life among specific patient populations. Appropriate analgesia and sedation throughout the implantation procedure is crucial for the patient’s stability. This paper aims to describe the advantages of both interpectoral plane block (PECS I) and interpecto-seratus plane block (PECS II) for the implantation of cardiac devices. Combining PECS I and PECS II blocks provides advantages for the thoracic wall procedures. While the PECS I block anesthetizes the medial and lateral pectoral nerves, PECS II extends coverage to upper intercostal nerves (T2-T7), as well as the long thoracic and thoracodorsal nerves, covering areas that are not anesthetize adequately by PECS I alone. Minimizing the need for opioids, leading to fewer opioid related side effects contributing to shorter recovery time and nonetheless creating less discomfort for the patient. This combined regional technique offers comfort to the patient due to its sole puncture needed for performance and by offering an extensive anesthesia at the site of the procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butiulca et al. (2024) studied Cardiac implantable electronic device implantation. Combined PECS I and PECS II blocks was evaluated. Combining PECS I and PECS II blocks offers a safe and effective regional anesthesia technique for cardiac device implantation, providing extensive coverage with a single puncture.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: