Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Parastomal herniation is a common complication, and its operative treatment is notoriously difficult. Recently, the authors have described a laparoscopic technique for closure and reinforcement of the hernia with a hand-made "funnel-shaped" Gore-Tex Dual Mesh. Potentially this technique combines the advantages of a mesh repair with those of minimal invasive surgery. METHODS: In 2002, a multicenter trial of this new technique was started in The Netherlands. To date, 55 consecutive patients (27 men; median age, 63 years) with a symptomatic primary (n = 45) or recurrent (n = 10) parastomal hernia have undergone elective surgery using this technique. The demographic, perioperative, and early follow-up data prospectively collected for these patients are presented in this report. RESULTS: Of the 55 procedures, 47 (85.5%) could be completed laparoscopically (median operation time, 120 min). Conversion to laparotomy was indicated because of dense adhesions prohibiting safe dissection (n = 4) or bowel injury (n = 4). No in-hospital mortality occurred. Postoperative recovery was uneventful for 47 patients (85%), who had a median hospital stay of 4 days. Surgical and nonsurgical complications occurred, respectively, for four patients each (7.2%). Full-thickness enterotomy appeared to be the most troublesome complication. After 6 weeks, when all the patients were reexamined, one recurrence was noted. CONCLUSION: Maximal efforts should be undertaken to prevent perioperative full-thickness enterotomy. Because this was achieved for the vast majority of patients, it is concluded that laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair is feasible and safe. Although a longer follow-up period is needed for definitive conclusions to be drawn regarding the recurrence rate, early follow-up evaluation shows very promising results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansson et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: