Key result
Marijuana use is linked to coronary vasospasm-induced STEMI resolving with calcium channel blocker therapy.
Why the study?
Marijuana-induced coronary vasospasm causing myocardial infarction has rarely been reported despite increasing marijuana use and misconceptions about its safety.
Case Report (n=1)
Marijuana use can be associated with coronary vasospasm leading to ST-elevation myocardial infarction, even in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease.
Consider cannabis in young STEMI with vasospasm; single case leaves open need for confirmatory studies.
Marijuana is the most commonly used psychoactive drug in the USA. A 35-year-old man with a medical history of marijuana abuse is admitted to the hospital due to crushing substernal chest pain. ECG shows evolving ST-segment elevation with a rise in cardiac enzymes, consistent with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. A urine toxicology screen is positive for cannabis and negative for cocaine and other stimulant drugs. An emergent cardiac catheterisation reveals no evidence of coronary artery disease or thrombosis. A diagnosis of coronary vasospasm is strongly considered, and the patient is started on calcium channel blocker, with a resolution of symptoms and ECG changes. Marijuana-induced coronary spasm causing myocardial infarction has rarely been reported. Marijuana is becoming a social norm in adolescents and there remains a misconception that it is harmless and even beneficial. Increasing drug abuse remains a public health concern, necessitating population education by physicians for safer healthcare practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2018) conducted a case report in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=1). Marijuana was evaluated on ST-elevation myocardial infarction secondary to coronary vasospasm. Marijuana use was associated with ST-elevation myocardial infarction secondary to coronary vasospasm in a 35-year-old man, which resolved with calcium channel blocker therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: