Key result
Head-up tilting with CLS pacemakers is linked to a nonphysiological ~20 bpm sensor rate increase.
Why the study?
Some patients with closed-loop stimulation pacing systems experience inappropriate tachycardia related to postural changes, and it is unclear if rate response is influenced by rapid changes in right ventricular filling.
Does rapid preload reduction during head-up tilting cause an overshooting sensor rate increase in patients with a CLS pacemaker compared to controls?
Observational (n=26)
Does rapid preload reduction during head-up tilting cause an overshooting sensor rate increase in patients with a CLS pacemaker compared to controls?
Rapid preload reduction during postural changes can cause inappropriate tachycardia in patients with closed-loop stimulation pacemakers due to nonphysiological sensor rate increases.
Postural changes may trigger inappropriate tachycardia with CLS; leaves open need for sensor refinements before routine adoption.
Closed-loop stimulation (CLS) is a new sensor concept for rate adaptive pacing measuring changes in the unipolar right ventricular impedance, which correlates to changes of the right ventricular contractility and reflects the autonomic nervous innervation of the heart. Some patients do not tolerate the CLS mode because of inappropriate tachycardia, mainly related to postural changes. This study tested if the rate response of the CLS sensor is influenced not only by myocardial contractility but also by rapid changes in right ventricular filling. In 12 patients (10 men, median age 77 years) with a Biotronik Inos(2)-CLS DDDR pacemaker and 14 controls (13 men, median age 59 years) head-up tilt and handgrip testing was performed to provoke rapid changes in pre- and afterload. Tilting the pacemaker patients resulted in a nonphysiological steep increase of the sensor rate (increase >20 beats/min, peak after 1 minute, return to baseline within 2-3 minutes), which was significantly different from the control group, showing only a slight rise in intrinsic heart rate immediately after tilting. Simultaneously to the rapid increase in sensor rate, the pacemaker patients showed a marked orthostatic decline of systolic blood pressure. During handgripping, heart rate and blood pressure curves were similar in both groups. In patients with this CLS pacemaker, rapid preload reduction during head-up tilting caused an overshooting sensor rate increase, reproducing the authors' clinical observation of postural pacemaker tachycardia in some patients. Consequently, they concluded that the rate response of the CLS pacing system can be inappropriately influenced by rapid shifts of blood volume, affecting right ventricular filling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cron et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Patients with a Biotronik Inos(2)-CLS DDDR pacemaker (n=26). Biotronik Inos(2)-CLS DDDR pacemaker vs. Controls was evaluated on Sensor rate response during head-up tilt and handgrip testing. Head-up tilting in patients with a closed-loop stimulation pacemaker caused a nonphysiological steep increase in sensor rate (>20 beats/min) compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: