Key result
Percutaneous iliac biventricular ICD placement succeeds in two patients with upper-extremity venous occlusion.
Why the study?
Alternative venous access approaches for CRT device implantation are needed when upper-extremity venous access is compromised, such as in superior vena cava occlusion.
Is biventricular ICD placement percutaneously via the iliac vein feasible in patients with compromised upper-extremity vascular access?
Case Report (n=2)
Is biventricular ICD placement percutaneously via the iliac vein feasible in patients with compromised upper-extremity vascular access?
Percutaneous iliac vein access for biventricular ICD placement is a feasible alternative when standard upper-extremity access is precluded.
May support iliac access for BiV ICD when upper-extremity access fails; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been demonstrated to improve symptoms of heart failure. As a result, it has become the standard of care in selected patients, and is commonly completed with three leads placed via an upper-extremity vein. However, in rare situations, such as in the case of superior vena cava occlusion, venous access is not possible via the upper extremity. It is in such instances that alternative means must be sought. Here, two patients who received a CRT defibrillator via an iliac vein approach with a mid-abdominal generator are introduced, and a review of the techniques used is presented. Technical aspects to this approach are discussed, including iliac venous access, defibrillation electrode positioning, coronary sinus access, and lead tunneling to an abdominal generator for patient comfort. This approach should be considered when vascular access is compromised, at least until combined leadless CRT pacing and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices become available and feasible for use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steven L. Higgins (2017) conducted a case report in Heart failure with upper-extremity venous occlusion (n=2). Biventricular ICD placement percutaneously via the iliac vein with mid-abdominal generator was evaluated on Successful device implantation and clinical improvement. Percutaneous biventricular ICD placement via the iliac vein with a mid-abdominal generator was successfully performed in two patients with upper-extremity venous occlusion, leading to clinical improvement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: