Key result
Ischemic preconditioning 24 hours before coronary occlusion reduces infarct size by ~32% in rabbits.
Why the study?
A delayed second window of myocardial protection appears about 24 hours after ischemic preconditioning in anesthetized animals, but its existence in conscious rabbits was untested.
Does delayed ischemic preconditioning reduce infarct size in a conscious rabbit model of ischemia-reperfusion?
Does delayed ischemic preconditioning reduce infarct size in a conscious rabbit model of ischemia-reperfusion?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A second window of protection (delayed preconditioning) exists in conscious rabbits, which minimizes both infarction and arrhythmias and is associated with increased myocardial cytoprotective protein content.
Myocardial protection associated with ischemic preconditioning (PC) wanes within an hour or two. It has recently been observed, however, that a delayed phase of protection appears about 24 h after ischemic PC in anesthetized rabbits and dogs which might be related to synthesis of cytoprotective proteins. We tested whether a second window of protection could be induced in conscious rabbits. Rabbits chronically instrumented with a coronary artery occluder and ECG electrodes experienced a 30-min coronary occlusion followed by 3 h reperfusion. Infarct size was measured with triphenyltetrazolium chloride. 35.7 ± 2.3% of the risk zone infarcted in control animals. PC with 4 cycles of 5-min coronary occlusion/10-min reperfusion 24 h prior to the 30-min ischemia decreased infarction to 24.1 ± 1.4% of the risk zone (P < 0.01). During the 30-min occlusion 3 of 7 non-PC rabbits developed ventricular fibrillation, while this arrhythmia did not occur in the 7 PC animals (P < 0.1). Myocardial hsp70 content in PC rabbits was twice that in controls. Collateral blood flow was not different in the two groups. A second window of protection exists in conscious rabbits which minimizes both infarction and arrhythmias, and cytoprotective protein content is increased in the myocardium of protected animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (1996) studied Myocardial infarction (n=14). Ischemic preconditioning vs. Control (no preconditioning) was evaluated on Infarct size as a percentage of the risk zone (p=<0.01). Ischemic preconditioning 24 hours prior to a 30-minute coronary occlusion reduced infarct size from 35.7% to 24.1% of the risk zone in conscious rabbits (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: