Key result
CareLink remote monitoring linked to ~3 fewer minutes of physician consultation time and high acceptance.
Why the study?
The acceptance of remote monitoring systems for implanted cardiac devices in Japan was not well characterized, considering country-specific telemedicine factors.
Does remote monitoring using the CareLink Monitor improve patient and physician satisfaction and reduce follow-up time burden in patients with implantable cardiac devices?
Observational (n=203)
Yes
Does remote monitoring using the CareLink Monitor improve patient and physician satisfaction and reduce follow-up time burden in patients with implantable cardiac devices?
Mean Difference: -2.7
Absolute Event Rate: 6.35% vs 9.05%
p-value: p=<0.001
Remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices is feasible, well-accepted, and significantly reduces the time burden for both patients and physicians in Japan.
Supports reduced follow-up burden with high acceptance; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation of outcomes.
The number of implanted cardiac devices has been growing steadily over the last several years. Systems to monitor device data remotely have been introduced with the goal of reducing follow-up burden for both patients and physicians. Since the introduction of telemedicine depends greatly on the situations that are unique to each country, the acceptance of cardiac device remote monitoring in Japan was analyzed.A total of 203 patients who had previously undergone cardiac device implantation were enrolled. The subjects were provided with a CareLink Monitor that performed interrogation and transmission of device data at home, and then the physicians reviewed the data via a website at one and 3 months after baseline visits. A total of 470 transmissions were made. Questionnaires were completed by subjects and physicians to evaluate acceptance, ease of use, and satisfaction with the system. More than 87% of the subjects felt the Monitor was easy to use and nearly all of the physicians were satisfied with the system. A majority of patients felt reassured by having their devices assessed from a remote location and preferred the decreased number of clinic visits that were possible when using the Monitor. The patients spent an average of 168.2 minutes per clinic visit, whereas follow-up time was reduced to 13.0 minutes by remote monitoring. Physician consultation time was reduced by 2.7 minutes.The CareLink Network was well accepted by both the patients and physicians. Underlying issues did emerge, but once they are overcome, the system appears to have great potential to improve the quality of care given by healthcare providers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andò et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Implantable cardiac devices (pacemaker, ICD, CRT-D) (n=203). CareLink Network remote monitoring system vs. In-clinic follow-up was evaluated on Physician consultation time (minutes) (MD -2.7 minutes, p=<0.001). The CareLink remote monitoring system was highly accepted by patients and physicians, significantly reducing physician consultation time by 2.7 minutes and patient follow-up time from 168.2 to 13.0 minutes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: