Key result
Left QRS axis deviation during new-onset LBBB after TAVR was associated with an increased risk of permanent pacemaker implantation compared to normal axis (16% vs. 6%; HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.06-5.73).
Why the study?
The clinical impact of left QRS axis deviation during new-onset LBBB after TAVR remains unclear.
Does left QRS axis deviation increase the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVR?
Cohort
Does left QRS axis deviation increase the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVR?
Left QRS axis deviation in patients with new-onset LBBB post-TAVR is an independent predictor for permanent pacemaker implantation at 3 years, suggesting a need for extended rhythm monitoring.
Background: The clinical impact of left QRS axis deviation (LAD) during new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear. Methods and Results: was associated with a higher incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) for atrioventricular conduction disorder (16% vs. 6%; P=0.02) and remained an independent predictor of PPI (Cox hazard ratio 2.46; 95% CI 1.06-5.73; P=0.04). Echocardiographic measures, including left ventricular ejection fraction, chamber size, and mitral regurgitation severity showed no significant longitudinal differences between groups. Conclusions: is associated with an increased need for PPI, but not with adverse mortality or heart failure outcomes at 3-year follow-up. Closer and extended rhythm monitoring may be warranted in this subgroup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasaki et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in New-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Left QRS axis deviation vs. Normal QRS axis was evaluated on Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) for atrioventricular conduction disorder (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.06-5.73, p=0.04). Left QRS axis deviation during new-onset LBBB after TAVR was associated with an increased risk of permanent pacemaker implantation compared to normal axis (16% vs. 6%; HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.06-5.73).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: