Key result
Heavy vehicle driving shows no link to higher arrhythmia prevalence compared to non-drivers.
Why the study?
Arrhythmias that may affect driving safety in heavy vehicle drivers require determination of their frequency to guide diagnosis and treatment.
Is the prevalence of arrhythmias higher in heavy vehicle drivers compared to controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=360)
No
Is the prevalence of arrhythmias higher in heavy vehicle drivers compared to controls?
The prevalence of arrhythmias in heavy vehicle drivers is high but not statistically different from controls, highlighting the need for routine screening in this occupational group.
No arrhythmia excess seen in heavy vehicle drivers; leaves open undetected occupational risks in larger prospective studies.
Objective: In our study we aimed to determine the frequency of arrhythmias that we believe may affect driving safety. Methods and Results: Two hundred drivers were randomly selected from the heavy vehicle driver population (82 bus and 118 truck drivers, p = 0.08, q = 0.92, N = 1200, α = 0.01, d = 0.045). A questionnaire was completed via face to face interviews with the individuals including questions about their personal socio-demographic characteristics and symptoms for arrhythmias. An electrocardiography (ECG) was taken of the study participants using the Cardioline Delta 3 Plus Digital ECG machine. The cardiologist at the clinic evaluated the questionnaire and ECG for presence of arrhythmias. When indicated, ambulatory electrocardiography (Holter Monitoring) was performed for 24 hours in 133 individuals (71 driver and 62 control). In cases that had Holter examination; ventricular ectopy was identified in 25.4% and 22.6%, and supra-ventricular ectopy in 45.1% and 35.5% in the driver and the control groups; respectively. Ventricular tachycardia was detected in 2 patients. Arrhythmia frequencies were 59.1%, 54.8% and 57.1% in drivers, control and both groups respectively. Statistical differences between drivers and control group for rhythm disorders were not detected. Conclusions: Arrhythmias with lethal and devastating potential; need to be diagnosed and treated in professional drivers with extreme caution. The follow up and screening for heart diseases has a crucial role in preventing accidents and occupational diseases in drivers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özdemir et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Arrhythmias (n=360). Heavy vehicle driving vs. Non-driver controls was evaluated on Presence of any kind of arrhythmia on 24-hour Holter monitoring (p=>0.05). Heavy vehicle driving was not associated with a significantly higher prevalence of arrhythmias compared to non-drivers, with arrhythmias detected in 59.1% of drivers and 54.8% of controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases