Key result
Multi-territorial ischemic stroke reveals non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis linked to underlying non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Why the study?
Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) as a cause of embolic stroke associated with malignancy requires early recognition for appropriate treatment.
Case Report (n=1)
No
This case highlights the importance of considering malignancy-associated non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis in patients presenting with embolic stroke.
May warrant malignancy evaluation in NBTE-associated stroke; hypothesis-generating and requires validation in larger series.
We discuss the case of a 71-year-old male with various comorbidities who presented to the Emergency Department for prostration and gait abnormalities. Neurological assessment and imaging studies revealed a multi-territorial ischemic stroke. Further investigation identified a cardiac mass, raising suspicion of non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE), after ruling out infectious causes. Further investigation, a thoracoabdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a pulmonary mass, confirmed as non-small cell lung carcinoma. The final diagnosis was cardioembolic stroke secondary to NBTE, associated with a hypercoagulable state induced by malignancy. The patient was started on therapeutic anticoagulation and referred for multidisciplinary management. This case underscores the significance of NBTE in stroke cases, highlighting the importance of early consideration of malignancy. Early identification is crucial for prompt initiation of appropriate treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mateus et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Ischemic stroke and non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (n=1). Therapeutic anticoagulation was evaluated on Clinical outcome. A 71-year-old male presenting with a multi-territorial ischemic stroke was diagnosed with non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis unveiling an underlying non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: