Key result
Lower left atrial scar burden post-RF ablation is linked to higher AF recurrence.
Why the study?
Left atrial radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation has variable success rates and AF recurrence remains a clinical challenge.
Is left atrial scar burden determined by DE-CMR post-radiofrequency ablation associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with paroxysmal and chronic AF?
Observational (n=27)
Single-blind
No
Is left atrial scar burden determined by DE-CMR post-radiofrequency ablation associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with paroxysmal and chronic AF?
A lower left atrial scar burden quantified by DE-CMR post-radiofrequency ablation is significantly associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change ablation endpoints or follow-up; leaves open scar burden's role in atrial fibrillation recurrence prediction.
Left atrial (LA) radiofrequency (RF) ablation has become routine treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) but still suffers from AF recurrence requiring a repeat procedure. LA-RF ablation success rates vary between 53% and 85%. Delayed-enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (DE-CMR) can be used to noninvasively visualize LA hyperenhancement (scar). We have utilized DE-CMR to quantify LA scar extent post LA-RF-ablation and related this measure to AF recurrence. Twenty-seven patients (62.0±11.1 years, 20 males) with paroxysmal and chronic AF underwent LA-RF-ablation and subsequent DE-CMR, an average of 260.7±314.7 days post procedure. The DE-CMR procedure was performed utilizing a navigated 3D inversion recovery gradient echo sequence (Siemens 1.5T Avanto or 3.0T Verio) approximately 15 minutes after administration of 0.2 mmol/kg Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic Acid−Gadolinium (DTPA-Gd, Magnevist, Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, NJ). All scans were electrocardiographically (ECG)-gated and acquired during a 150 ms window in mid-diastole with navigator-gating and fat suppression. We have developed an image analysis method and graphical user interface to semi-automatically quantify hyperenhanced regions in the LA wall (scar). LA scar was quantified by a single experienced observer blinded to patient data. LA-scar measurements were normalized by LA size. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess intra-observer variability of 4 randomly selected scans which were re-read one week later. Variables were tested for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test and a p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant (all tests were 2-sided). All patients provided informed consent. The DE-CMR scans were performed 260.7±314.7 days after the initial LA-RF- ablation procedure (Figure). AF recurrence was noted to occur in 13 (48%) patients whereas 14 (52%) patients demonstrated no AF recurrence. There was a trend toward a larger LA-volume in the AF-recurrence group (128.49±44.0 ml vs. 96.0±38.5 ml; p=0.06, see Table 1 ). Left ventricle ejection fractions (LVEF) were smaller in the AF-recurrence group but the difference was not statistically significant (58.93±12.1% vs. 64.85±6.2.1%, p=0.092). Average analysis time per scan was 14.5±7 min and intra-observer variability was excellent (ICC=0.99). LA-scar was normally distributed (p=0.151). Average LA scar extent, quantified in post LA-RF-ablation DE-CMR scans, was significantly larger in recurrence-free AF patients (16.56±5.3 cm2) when compared with individuals with AF-recurrence (11.40±7.6 cm2; p=0.036). The results indicate that there is a significant inverse relationship between LA-scar burden and AF-recurrence. LA scar extent can be reproducibly quantified with DE-CMR; and a lower scar burden post LA-RF-ablation is associated with AF recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brunner et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=27). Left atrial scar burden vs. Recurrence-free patients was evaluated on Left atrial scar extent (p=0.036). Lower left atrial scar burden post-radiofrequency ablation is significantly associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence (11.40 cm2 vs 16.56 cm2 in recurrence-free patients, p=0.036).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: