Key result
Negative pressure wound therapy cuts social costs ~28% vs standard dressing while reducing hospitalization.
Why the study?
The clinical and economic impact of negative pressure wound therapy compared to traditional dressings in vascular surgery patients with peripheral arterial disease at risk of postoperative complications was not fully evaluated in Italian practice.
Does negative pressure wound therapy improve clinical and economic outcomes compared to traditional dressings in PAD patients undergoing vascular surgery?
Does negative pressure wound therapy improve clinical and economic outcomes compared to traditional dressings in PAD patients undergoing vascular surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Negative pressure wound therapy for vascular surgery incisions in PAD patients reduces hospitalization days and social costs while improving clinical effectiveness and safety compared to traditional dressings.
This evaluation shows the main advantages related to the introduction of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in Italian clinical practice for the management of incisions in vascular surgery in patients suffering from peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and at risk of postoperative complications, compared to treatment with traditional dressings. A health technology assessment (HTA) activity was conducted assuming the hospital perspective, within a 12-month time horizon. The nine EUnetHTA Core Model dimensions were deeply explored, using scientific evidence on the topic, real-life data, and healthcare professionals' perceptions. The evaluation shows that the use of NPWT has had a positive impact in terms of higher clinical effectiveness and safety profile. The process mapping highlights how NPWT allows a reduction of 2.5 hospitalization days compared with standard dressing, with the consequent benefits considering economic, organizational, and social aspects. A significant economic saving per patient emerged, with an overall optimization of the patient's clinical pathway, impacting positively on the hospital's capacity. The budget impact analysis shows that the higher number of patients treated with NPWT, the higher the economic advantages. Furthermore, assuming the patient's perspective, it would generate an overall reduction in social costs of 28%. In conclusion, the results of this study provide helpful evidence-based information to policymakers through examinations of the relative values of intervention, thus supporting the overall hospital and institutional decision-making process to define appropriate areas of investments, leading to the achievement of not only higher clinical outcomes, but also important social, economic, and organizational advantages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolazzo et al. (2023) studied Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) requiring vascular surgery. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) vs. Traditional dressings was evaluated on Hospitalization days and economic/social costs. Negative pressure wound therapy reduced hospitalization by 2.5 days compared with standard dressing and generated an overall reduction in social costs of 28%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: