Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The taxonomy of African species ofAntestiopsis, some of which are important pests of coffee, has hitherto been in confusion owing to the difficulty of finding decisive morphological characters. In the present study an attempt is made to clarify the relationships of the coffee pest species and some of their close allies by the use of both biological and morphological characters. The species ofAntestiaandAntestiopsisoccurring on coffee in Africa are differentiated in a key, and descriptions are given of the following:Antestiopsis orbitalis(Westw.), with three clearly distinguishable subspecies,orbitalis, bech-uana(Kirkaldy) andghesquiereiCarayon, several local colour forms of these, and a few variable populations that cannot be referred definitely to any one of the subspecies;A. intricata(Ghesq. & Carayon); A.facetoidessp.n. for the species hitherto known as “ faceta ” in eastern Kenya and Tanzania;A. crypta, sp.n. confined to Katanga;A. falsa(Schout.), a rare and imperfectly known species;A. lepelleyisp.n., which does not feed on coffee; andA. littoralissp.n., from the Kenya coast, known to the writer only from museum specimens. Evidence for the arrangement adopted is discussed, and the taxonomic value of certain morphological characters is assessed. The distributions presented on maps are discussed, and it is concluded that the activities of man are unlikely to have obscured the natural patterns. A list is given of known host-plants, which, except for those ofA. orbitalis orbitalisand formfacetus, are with only a single other exception members of the Eubiaceae. The distribution on a local scale and recent changes of abundance of species in competition are discussed, and it is shown thatA. orbitalis ghesquiereiandA. o. bechuanaappear to be spreading at the expense ofA. intricatain Uganda andA. facetoidesin Tanzania, respectively. Kesults of crossing East African species and forms show that those here regarded as species will not cross but that the subspecies ofA. orbitaliswill do so, producing intermediates that, when allowed to interbreed, are not as viable as pure strains. Finally an attempt to find morphometrical characters is discussed, and the results are given of a calculation of discriminant functions based on two characters. These, while, not conclusive, support the conclusions drawn from other evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. J. Greathead (1966) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: