Key result
Recombinant inactive antithrombin cuts heparin activity ~60% vs protamine without hemodynamic side effects.
Why the study?
Heparin anticoagulation followed by protamine reversal is commonly used in CPB, but protamine has haemodynamic side effects and increased histamine levels.
Does recombinant inactive antithrombin (riAT) reverse heparin anticoagulation safely and effectively compared to protamine in a rat model of cardiopulmonary bypass?
Does recombinant inactive antithrombin (riAT) reverse heparin anticoagulation safely and effectively compared to protamine in a rat model of cardiopulmonary bypass?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.8% vs 4.5%
Recombinant inactive antithrombin is a potent and potentially safer alternative to protamine for heparin reversal in cardiopulmonary bypass, avoiding haemodynamic instability in a rat model.
May warrant clinical evaluation of riAT for heparin reversal; leaves open translation from this rat model to human cardiopulmonary bypass.
Heparin anticoagulation followed by protamine reversal is commonly used in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). As an alternative to protamine, a recombinant inactive antithrombin (riAT) was designed as an antidote to heparin and was previously shown to be as potent as protamine in-vitro. In the present study, riAT was assessed for its ability to neutralize heparin after CPB in a rat model. After 60 min of CPB under heparin, rats received 5 mg/kg protamine, 37.5 mg/kg riAT or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) as placebo. Residual anticoagulant activity was assessed using the activated partial thromboplastin time assay before, and 10-30 min after reversion. Haemodynamic monitoring was performed and plasma histamine concentration was also measured. In this model, riAT appeared to be as efficient as protamine in neutralizing heparin. Ten minutes after injection, riAT and protamine both decreased heparin activity, to 1.8 ± 1.3 and 4.5 ± 1.4 u/ml, respectively (23.1 ± 5.1 u/ml in placebo group). Furthermore, evolution of mean carotid arterial pressure, heart rate and plasma histamine levels was comparable in rats treated with PBS or riAT, while protamine exhibited haemodynamic side effects and increased histamine plasma concentration. Thus, riAT could represent an advantage over protamine in CPB because it efficiently reverses heparin activity without negative effects on haemodynamic parameters and plasma histamine level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bianchini et al. (2018) studied Heparin anticoagulation reversal in cardiopulmonary bypass. Recombinant inactive antithrombin (riAT) vs. Protamine (5 mg/kg) or placebo (PBS) was evaluated on Residual anticoagulant activity (heparin activity) 10 minutes after injection. Recombinant inactive antithrombin decreased heparin activity to 1.8 ± 1.3 u/ml compared to 4.5 ± 1.4 u/ml with protamine and 23.1 ± 5.1 u/ml with placebo, without haemodynamic side effects.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: