Key result
LV GLS detects abnormal systolic function in 68% of heart donors missed by LVEF.
Why the study?
Myocardial deformation analyses with LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) are more sensitive than LVEF for detecting impaired LV systolic performance in cardiac allografts, but their clinical implications are unclear.
Does left ventricular global longitudinal strain detect allograft systolic dysfunction better than left ventricular ejection fraction in heart donor-recipient pairs?
Cohort (n=34)
No
Does left ventricular global longitudinal strain detect allograft systolic dysfunction better than left ventricular ejection fraction in heart donor-recipient pairs?
Global longitudinal strain detects subclinical allograft left ventricular systolic dysfunction in heart donors and recipients that is missed by standard LVEF assessment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GLS may detect subclinical LV systolic dysfunction missed by LVEF in donors and recipients; leaves open its utility for donor selection or outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac allografts are routinely evaluated by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) before and after transplantation. However, myocardial deformation analyses with LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) are more sensitive for detecting impaired LV myocardial systolic performance compared with LVEF. METHODS: We analyzed echocardiograms in 34 heart donor-recipient pairs transplanted at Duke University from 2000 to 2013. Assessments of allograft LV systolic function by LVEF and/or LV GLS were performed on echocardiograms obtained pre-explanation in donors and serially in corresponding recipients. RESULTS: Donors had a median LVEF of 55% (25th, 75th percentile, 54% to 60%). Median donor LV GLS was -14.6% (-13.7 to -17.3%); LV GLS was abnormal (ie, >-16%) in 68% of donors. Post-transplantation, LV GLS was further impaired at 6 weeks (median -11.8%; -11.0 to -13.4%) and 3 months (median -11.4%; -10.3 to -13.9%) before recovering to pretransplant levels in follow-up. Median LVEF remained ≥50% throughout follow-up. We found no association between donor LV GLS and post-transplant outcomes, including all-cause hospitalization and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: GLS demonstrates allograft LV systolic dysfunction in donors and recipients not detected by LVEF. The clinical implications of subclinical allograft dysfunction detected by LV GLS require further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeVore et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Cardiac allograft / Heart transplantation (n=34). Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) vs. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was evaluated on Post-transplant outcomes including all-cause hospitalization and mortality. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain detected abnormal systolic function in 68% of heart donors and further impairment post-transplantation, which was not detected by LVEF.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: