Key result
In-house antigen-capture ELISA detects porcine rotavirus-A with ~94% sensitivity versus TaqMan RT-qPCR.
Why the study?
A simple, swift, cost-effective, highly specific, and sensitive assay for detection of porcine rotavirus-A was needed for large-scale surveillance and timely detection in porcine farms.
Does an in-house AC-ELISA accurately detect porcine rotavirus-A compared to RT-qPCR in porcine diarrhea samples?
Does an in-house AC-ELISA accurately detect porcine rotavirus-A compared to RT-qPCR in porcine diarrhea samples?
A newly developed AC-ELISA demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for detecting porcine rotavirus-A, offering a cost-effective tool for large-scale surveillance in porcine farms.
Rotaviruses are rising as zoonotic viruses worldwide, causing the lethal dehydrating diarrhea in children, piglets, and other livestock of economic importance. A simple, swift, cost-effective, highly specific, and sensitive antigen-capture enzyme–linked immunosorbent assay (AC-ELISA) was developed for detection of porcine rotavirus-A (PoRVA) by employing rabbit (capture antibody) and murine polyclonal antibodies (detector antibody) produced against VP6 of PoRVA (RVA/Pig-tc/CHN/TM-a/2009/G9P23). Reactivity of the both polyclonal antibodies was confirmed by using an indirect ELISA, western-blot analysis and indirect fluorescence assay against rVP6 protein and PoRVA. The detection limit of AC-ELISA was found 50 ng/ml of PoRVA protein. The relative sensitivity and specificity of this in-house AC-ELISA were evaluated for detection of PoRVA from 295 porcine diarrhea samples, and results were compared with that of RT-PCR and TaqMan RT-qPCR. The relative sensitivity and specificity of AC-ELISA compared with those of TaqMan RT-qPCR were found as 94.4 and 99.2%, respectively, with the strong agreement (κ −0.58) between these two techniques. Furthermore, AC-ELISA could not detect any cross-reactivity with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, transmissible gastro-enteritis virus, pseudo rabies virus and porcine circovirus-2. This in-house AC-ELISA efficiently detected PoRVA from clinical samples, which suggests that this technique can be used for large-scale surveillance and timely detection of rotavirus infection in the porcine farms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Memon et al. (2022) studied Porcine rotavirus-A (PoRVA) infection (n=295). Antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (AC-ELISA) vs. TaqMan RT-qPCR was evaluated on Relative sensitivity and specificity for detection of PoRVA. An in-house antigen-capture ELISA detected porcine rotavirus-A with a relative sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 99.2% compared to TaqMan RT-qPCR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: