Key result
Average global longitudinal strain (GLS_AVE) was independently associated with 5-year all-cause mortality (HR 1.10 per 1% absolute decrease) and provided incremental prognostic value over LVEF and endocardial strain.
Why the study?
Global longitudinal strain measured at different myocardial layers may have distinct diagnostic and predictive performance in heart failure, but their comparative value is unclear.
Does layer-specific strain measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance improve the identification of systolic dysfunction and prediction of 5-year mortality in patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=453)
Single-blind
Yes
Does layer-specific strain measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance improve the identification of systolic dysfunction and prediction of 5-year mortality in patients with heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 1.1 (95% CI 1.01–1.2)
p-value: p=0.023
Average global longitudinal strain and global radial strain measured by CMR are superior to endocardial strain and LVEF for predicting 5-year mortality in heart failure patients.
BACKGROUND: Global longitudinal strain (GLS), most commonly measured at the endocardium, has been shown to be superior to left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) for the identification of systolic dysfunction and prediction of outcomes in heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that strains measured at different myocardial layers (endocardium = ENDO, epicardium = EPI, average = AVE) will have distinct diagnostic and predictive performance for patients with HF. METHODS: Layer-specific GLS, layer-specific global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS) were evaluated by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) feature tracking in the Alberta HEART study. A total of 453 subjects consisted of healthy controls (controls, n = 77), at-risk for HF (at-risk, n = 143), HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, n = 87), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, n = 88) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n = 58). For outcomes analysis, CMR-derived imaging parameters were adjusted with a base model that included age and N-terminal prohormone of b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to test their independent association with 5-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: GLS_EPI distinguished all groups with preserved LVEF (controls - 16.5 ± 2.4% vs. at-risk - 15.5 ± 2.7% vs. HFpEF - 14.1 ± 3.0%, p < 0.001) while GLS_ENDO and all GCS (all layers) were similar among these groups. GRS was reduced in HFpEF (41.1 ± 13.8% versus 48.9 ± 10.7% in controls, p < 0.001) and the difference between GLS_EPI and GLS_ENDO were significantly larger in HFpEF as compared to controls. Within the preserved LVEF groups, reduced GRS and GLS_EPI were significantly associated with increased LV mass (LVM) and LVM/LV end-diastolic volume EDV (concentricity). In multivariable analysis, only GLS_AVE and GRS predicted 5-year all-cause mortality (all ps < 0.05), with the strongest association with 5-year all-cause mortality by Akaike Information Criterion analysis and significant incremental value for outcomes prediction beyond LVEF or GLS_ENDO by the likelihood ratio test. CONCLUSION: Global strains measured on endocardium, epicardium or averaged across the wall thickness are not equivalent for the identification of systolic dysfunction or outcomes prediction in HF. The endocardium-specific strains were shown to have poorest all-around performance. GLS_AVE and GRS were the only CMR parameters to be significantly associated with 5-year all-cause mortality in multivariable analysis. GLS_EPI and GRS, as well as the difference in endocardial and epicardial strains, were sensitive to systolic dysfunction among HF patients with normal LVEF (> 55%), in whom lower strains were associated with increased concentricity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=453). Average global longitudinal strain (GLS_AVE) vs. Endocardial global longitudinal strain (GLS_ENDO) and LVEF was evaluated on 5-year all-cause mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20, p=0.023). Average global longitudinal strain (GLS_AVE) was independently associated with 5-year all-cause mortality (HR 1.10 per 1% absolute decrease) and provided incremental prognostic value over LVEF and endocardial strain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: