Key result
Febrile temperatures enhance peak sodium current inhibition by flecainide and lidocaine but blunt ajmaline and ranolazine.
Why the study?
Fever can increase susceptibility to arrhythmias involving sodium channel dysfunction, but whether fever influences the efficacy of sodium channel blocking drugs is unknown.
Does hyperthermia (40°C vs 36°C) influence the effects of sodium channel blocking drugs on sodium currents in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes?
Does hyperthermia (40°C vs 36°C) influence the effects of sodium channel blocking drugs on sodium currents in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes?
p-value: p=<0.05
Temperature variation into the febrile range alters the electrophysiological effects of sodium channel blockers in human cardiomyocytes, potentially impacting their antiarrhythmic efficacy during fever.
Fever-range hyperthermia may differentially modulate Na-channel blocker effects on INa; hypothesis-generating for antiarrhythmic efficacy in febrile patients, needing clinical confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Fever can increase the susceptibility to supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias, in which sodium channel dysfunction has been implicated. Whether fever influences the efficacy of sodium channel blocking drugs is unknown. The current study was designed to investigate the temperature dependent effects of distinct sodium channel blocking drugs on the sodium currents in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). METHODS AND RESULTS: hiPSC-CMs were generated from human skin fibroblasts of a healthy donor. The peak and late sodium currents (INa), steady-state activation, inactivation and recovery from inactivation of INa in hiPSC-CMs were analyzed using the whole-cell patch clamp technique. The effects of different concentrations of the antiarrhythmic drugs flecainide, lidocaine, ajmaline and the antianginal drug ranolazine on INa were tested at 36°C and 40°C. Increasing the temperature of the bath solution from 36°C to 40°C enhanced the inhibition of peak INa but reduced the inhibition of late INa by flecainide and lidocaine. By contrast, increasing the temperature reduced the effect of ajmaline and ranolazine on the peak INa but not late INa. None of the tested drugs showed temperature-dependent effects on the steady-state activation and inactivation as well as on the recovery from inactivation of INa in hiPSC-CMs. CONCLUSIONS: Temperature variation from the physiological to the febrile range apparently influences the effects of sodium channel blockers on the sodium currents. This may influence their antiarrhythmic efficacy in patients suffering from fever.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El‐Battrawy et al. (2016) studied Healthy donor (in vitro hiPSC-CMs). Hyperthermia (40°C) and sodium channel blockers vs. Physiological temperature (36°C) was evaluated on Inhibition of peak and late sodium currents (INa) (p=<0.05). Increasing temperature from 36°C to 40°C enhanced the inhibition of peak sodium currents by flecainide and lidocaine, but reduced the inhibitory effects of ajmaline and ranolazine.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: