Key result
Balloon-expandable valves show similar rates of early subclinical leaflet thrombosis compared to self-expandable valves.
Why the study?
It was uncertain whether balloon-expandable and self-expandable transcatheter heart valves differ in the incidence of early subclinical leaflet thrombosis.
Does balloon-expandable THV compared to self-expandable THV reduce early subclinical leaflet thrombosis in patients undergoing TAVI?
Cohort (n=629)
Does balloon-expandable THV compared to self-expandable THV reduce early subclinical leaflet thrombosis in patients undergoing TAVI?
The type and size of transcatheter heart valve do not predict early subclinical leaflet thrombosis, whereas the lack of anticoagulation is a significant predictor.
No difference in early LT by THV type warrants no change in valve selection; leaves open prospective trials on anticoagulation impact.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether balloon-expandable and self-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THVs) differ in terms of the incidence of early subclinical leaflet thrombosis (LT). METHODS: Electrocardiographic-gated cardiac dual-source computed tomography angiography was performed at a median of 5 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and assessed for evidence of LT. RESULTS: Of the 629 consecutive patients, 538 (86%) received a balloon-expandable THV and 91 (14%) a self-expandable THV. LT was documented in 77 (14%) patients with a balloon-expandable valve and in 16 (18%) with a self-expandable valve (P = 0.42). Similarly, LT was not significantly related to THV size (P = 0.62). Corresponding to a lower rate of atrial fibrillation in the group with LT [25 (27%) vs 222 (41%), P = 0.01], anticoagulation at the time of computed tomography angiography was less frequent in this group [21 (23%) vs 183 (34%), P = 0.03]. Among the other potentially relevant covariables, there was no significant difference in the clinical baseline and the procedural characteristics between patients with and without LT (age 82 ± 6 years vs 82 ± 6 years, P = 0.51; ejection fraction 49 ± 10% vs 50 ± 10%, P = 0.47). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, including potentially relevant covariables, valve type was not significantly associated with LT (P = 0.36). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, only the lack of anticoagulation at the time of computed tomography angiography was predictive of thrombus formation [0.563 (0.335-0.944), P = 0.03; 0.576 (0.343-0.970), P = 0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective study of 629 patients, the type and the size of THV was not predictive of early LT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruile et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (n=629). Balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve vs. Self-expandable transcatheter heart valve was evaluated on Early subclinical leaflet thrombosis (p=0.42). Balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves were associated with a similar incidence of early subclinical leaflet thrombosis compared to self-expandable valves (14% vs 18%, P=0.42).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: