Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Persistence of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an overall marker of treatment success. OBJECTIVE: To assess the survival of anti-TNF treatment and to define the potential predictors of drug discontinuation in RA, in order to verify the adequacy of current practices. DESIGN: An observational, descriptive, longitudinal, retrospective study. SETTING: The Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. PATIENTS: RA patients treated with anti-TNF therapy between January 2011 and January 2012. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic information and therapy assessments were gathered from medical and pharmaceutical records. Data is expressed as means (standard deviations) for quantitative variables and frequency distribution for qualitative variables. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess persistence, and Cox multivariate regression models were used to assess potential predictors of treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: In total, 126 treatment series with infliximab (n = 53), etanercept (n = 51) or adalimumab (n = 22) were administered to 91 patients. Infliximab has mostly been used as a first-line treatment, but it was the drug with the shortest time until a change of treatment. Significant predictors of drug survival were: age; the anti-TNF agent; and the previous response to an anti-TNF drug. LIMITATION: The small sample size. CONCLUSION: The overall efficacy of anti-TNF drugs diminishes with time, with infliximab having the shortest time until a change of treatment. The management of biologic therapy in patients with RA should be reconsidered in order to achieve disease control with a reduction in costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez-Santana et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: