Key result
Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents show a ~2% 9-month TLR rate in unselected all-comers.
Why the study?
The safety and efficacy of polymer-free sirolimus coated ultrathin strut drug-eluting stents in an unselected patient population including ACS patients and the impact of DAPT duration in stable CAD were not well established.
Is the polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent safe and effective in an unselected all-comers population undergoing angioplasty?
Observational (n=2,877)
Yes
Is the polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent safe and effective in an unselected all-comers population undergoing angioplasty?
Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents demonstrate low rates of target lesion revascularization and MACE at 9 months in a real-world, unselected patient population.
Supports PF-SES evaluation in unselected ACS; leaves open optimal DAPT duration in stable CAD pending randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a polymer-free sirolimus coated, ultrathin strut drug-eluting stent (PF-SES) in an unselected patient population with a focus on acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Furthermore, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with short (≤6 months) versus long (>6 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were also studied. METHODS: Patients who received PF-SES were investigated in an unselected large-scale international, single-armed, multicenter, 'all comers' observational study. The primary endpoint was the 9-month target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate, whereas secondary endpoints included the 9-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and procedural success rates. A priori defined subgroups such as patients with ACS, diabetes, lesion subsets and procedural characteristics relative to DAPT were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 2877 patients of whom 1084 had ACS were treated with PF-SES (1.31±0.75 stents per patient). At 9 months, the accumulated overall TLR rate was 2.3% (58/2513). There was no significant difference between ACS and stable CAD (2.6% vs 2.1%, p=0.389). However, the overall MACE rate was 4.3% (108/2513) with a higher rate in patients with ACS when compared with the stable CAD subgroup (6.1%, 58/947 vs 3.2%, 50/1566, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PF-SES angioplasty is safe and effective in the daily clinical routine with low rates of TLR and MACE in an unselected patient population. Our data are in agreement with prior clinical findings that extended DAPT duration beyond 6 months do not improve clinical outcomes in patients with stable CAD (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02629575). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02629575.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krackhardt et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (acute coronary syndrome and stable CAD) (n=2,877). Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (PF-SES) was evaluated on 9-month target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate. Treatment with polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents in an unselected all-comers population resulted in an overall 9-month target lesion revascularization rate of 2.3%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: