Key result
Exercise testing with or without thallium adds little predictive value for major events in stable CAD.
Why the study?
The usefulness of exercise testing with thallium perfusion imaging for predicting cardiac events in patients with stable coronary disease after recovery from an acute coronary event was uncertain.
Does exercise testing with thallium scintigraphy improve prediction of cardiac events in patients with stable coronary disease after recovery from an acute coronary event?
Comparison
Exercise treadmill testing with planar thallium-201 scintigraphy vs no testing
Design
Cohort study
Follow-up
Average 23 months (range 6 to 43)
Authors
Loading...
Minimal added prediction from exercise testing in stable CAD; leaves open need for superior risk tools post-ACS.
Cohort (n=936)
Does exercise testing with thallium scintigraphy improve prediction of cardiac events in patients with stable coronary disease after recovery from an acute coronary event?
p-value: p=<0.05
Exercise testing and thallium scintigraphy have poor predictive performance for subsequent cardiac events in patients with stable coronary disease several months after an acute coronary event, limiting their clinical usefulness.
Krone et al. (1994) conducted a cohort in Stable coronary disease (n=936). Exercise treadmill testing with planar thallium-201 scintigraphy vs. Clinical variables alone was evaluated on Unstable angina requiring hospital admission, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or cardiac death (p=<0.05). Exercise testing with or without thallium scintigraphy added little to the overall prediction of primary cardiac events (AUC increased from 0.649 to 0.663) in stable coronary disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: