Key result
CMR native T1 high regions link to ~83% lower odds of LVEF recovery in DCM.
Why the study?
The association between native T1 mapping including the native T1 high region and LVEF recovery in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy was unclear.
Do native T1 mapping and native T1 high region predict left ventricular ejection fraction recovery in patients with newly diagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=71)
No
Do native T1 mapping and native T1 high region predict left ventricular ejection fraction recovery in patients with newly diagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy?
Native T1 mapping and the native T1 high region on cardiac MRI are independent predictors of LVEF recovery in patients with newly diagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy.
Native T1 high region associated with lower LVEF recovery odds; hypothesis-generating for CMR prognostication in new DCM, needs prospective validation.
Native T1 mapping is used to assess myocardial tissue characteristics without gadolinium contrast agents. The focal T1 high-intensity region can indicate myocardial alterations. This study aimed to identify the association between the native T1 mapping including the native T1 high region and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Patients with newly diagnosed DCM (LVEF of < 45%) who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with native T1 mapping were included in the analysis. Native T1 high region was defined as a signal intensity of > 5 SD in the remote myocardium. Recovered EF was defined as a follow-up LVEF of ≥ 45% and an LVEF increase of ≥ 10% after 2 years from baseline. Seventy-one patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Forty-four patients (61.9%) achieved recovered EF. Logistic regression analysis showed that the native T1 value (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96–0.99; P = 0.014) and the native T1 high region (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.05–0.55; P = 0.002), but not late gadolinium enhancement, were independent predictors of recovered EF. Compared with native T1 value alone, combined native T1 high region and native T1 value improved the area under the curve from 0.703 to 0.788 for predicting recovered EF. Myocardial damage, which was quantified using native T1 mapping and the native T1 high region were independently associated with recovered EF in patients with newly diagnosed DCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nabeta et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=71). Native T1 high region vs. Absence of native T1 high region was evaluated on Recovered left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 45% and increase ≥ 10%) at 2 years (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.55, p=0.002). The presence of a native T1 high region on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was independently associated with a lower likelihood of left ventricular ejection fraction recovery (OR 0.17) in patients with newly diagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: