Key result
Higher septal native T1 values show no independent association with major adverse events.
Why the study?
Risk stratification in non-ischemic DCM remains challenging because LVEF and LGE do not fully capture the underlying myocardial substrate, whereas septal native T1 mapping provides quantitative assessment of diffuse myocardial abnormalities.
Does septal native T1 mapping predict adverse clinical outcomes in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=45)
No
Does septal native T1 mapping predict adverse clinical outcomes in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Septal native T1 mapping shows a trend toward predicting adverse outcomes in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy but lacked independent prognostic value in this small cohort.
Septal native T1 showed no significant difference; leaves open its prognostic value in larger cohorts.
Background: Risk stratification in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains challenging because left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) do not fully capture the underlying myocardial substrate. Septal native T1 mapping provides a quantitative assessment of diffuse myocardial abnormalities and may contribute to myocardial tissue characterization within a multiparametric CMR framework. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 45 consecutive patients with non-ischemic DCM referred for clinically indicated CMR at Perrino Hospital, Brindisi, Italy, between November 2023 and November 2025. All examinations were performed using a standardized CMR protocol including cine imaging, LGE, and native T1 mapping on a 1.5-T Siemens Healthineers scanner. Septal native T1 was used as the primary mapping parameter because of its established reproducibility and robustness for myocardial tissue characterization. Patients were followed for a composite endpoint including all-cause mortality, major ventricular arrhythmic events, appropriate ICD therapy, and hospitalization for heart failure. Endpoint coding was verified, and all analyses were performed using the final validated dataset. Results: During a median follow-up of 15 months, 14 patients (31.1%) experienced the composite endpoint. Patients with events had lower LVEF (27.1 ± 7.8% vs. 48.3 ± 10.5%; p < 0.001), higher LVEDVi (142.6 ± 28.5 vs. 110.6 ± 23.4 mL/m2; p = 0.001), and higher septal native T1 values among patients with available T1 measurements (1047.5 ± 25.0 vs. 1031.5 ± 24.3 ms; p = 0.065). ROC analysis identified a septal native T1 threshold of 1042 ms for prediction of the composite endpoint, with an exploratory AUC of 0.70. Event-free survival was lower in patients with septal native T1 ≥ 1042 ms. Given the limited number of events, all regression and hierarchical analyses should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Conclusions: Higher septal native T1 values were observed in patients experiencing adverse clinical outcomes; however, native T1 was not independently associated with the composite endpoint in exploratory Cox regression analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montatore et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (n=45). Higher septal native T1 values vs. Lower septal native T1 values was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, major ventricular arrhythmic events, appropriate ICD therapy, and hospitalization for heart failure (p=0.065). Higher septal native T1 values trended higher in patients with adverse outcomes (1047.5 vs 1031.5 ms; p=0.065) but were not independently associated with the composite endpoint.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: