Key result
R-54718 depresses Vmax and conduction without use dependence, showing higher potency than most class I antiarrhythmics.
Why the study?
The cellular electrophysiologic effects of the lidocaine derivative R-54718, effective in treating arrhythmias, were studied to characterize its unique properties.
What are the cellular electrophysiologic effects of R-54718 on canine Purkinje fibers?
What are the cellular electrophysiologic effects of R-54718 on canine Purkinje fibers?
R-54718 is a highly potent lidocaine derivative with unique electrophysiologic properties, including a lack of use dependence and differential effects on normal versus abnormal automaticity.
We studied the cellular electrophysiologic effects of a lidocaine derivative, R-54718, that has been found effective in treating arrhythmias in experimental animals and in human subjects. R-54718 depresses Vmax, action potential amplitude, and conduction and accelerates repolarization of the canine Purkinje fiber action potential, with an effective concentration range 2 or 3 orders of magnitude lower than that of most class I antiarrhythmic drugs. Its action on Vmax shows no use dependence. In blood superfusion experiments its depressant effects on conduction are more profound than those of other class I compounds and significant toxicity can be seen. R-54718 also depresses delayed afterdepolarizations, as well as the abnormal automaticity occurring at low membrane potentials. However, automaticity occurring in fully polarized Purkinje fibers is not affected. In conclusion, R 54718 is unusual in its lack of use dependent action, in its differential action on normal and abnormal automaticity, and in its potency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (1987) studied Arrhythmias. R-54718 was evaluated on Cellular electrophysiologic effects. R-54718 depressed Vmax, action potential amplitude, and conduction in canine Purkinje fibers without use dependence, showing higher potency than most class I antiarrhythmic drugs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: