Key result
S-ICD after TV-ICD extraction is linked to low major reinfection and ~3% all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
Information on safety outcomes after subcutaneous ICD implantation in patients undergoing transvenous ICD explantation is limited.
Does S-ICD implantation after TV-ICD extraction for infection increase the risk of subsequent reinfection compared to de novo S-ICD implantation?
Comparison
S-ICD implantation after TV-ICD extraction vs de novo S-ICD implantation
Design
Cohort study from S-ICD IDE Study and EFFORTLESS Registry
Follow-up
Mean 651 days
Authors
Loading...
Low reinfection rates may support S-ICD after extraction; leaves open randomized comparison to de novo implantation.
Cohort (n=866)
Does S-ICD implantation after TV-ICD extraction for infection increase the risk of subsequent reinfection compared to de novo S-ICD implantation?
S-ICD implantation is a safe alternative for patients requiring device replacement after TV-ICD extraction, with a low risk of reinfection even in those explanted for prior system-related infection.
Boersma et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Prior TV-ICD explantation or de novo ICD indication (n=866). S-ICD implantation after TV-ICD extraction vs. De novo S-ICD implantation was evaluated on All-cause mortality and major infection. Subcutaneous ICD implantation after transvenous ICD extraction was associated with low rates of major reinfection and an overall all-cause mortality of 3.2% over a mean follow-up of 651 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: