Key result
Bovine pericardium patch shows no benefit over PTFE patch for VSD closure outcomes.
Why the study?
Comparative data on outcomes after ventricular septal defect closure using bovine pericardium versus PTFE patches are limited.
Does surgical correction with bovine pericardium compared to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch improve outcomes in patients with isolated ventricular septal defects?
Cohort (n=79)
Does surgical correction with bovine pericardium compared to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch improve outcomes in patients with isolated ventricular septal defects?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 7%
p-value: p=not statistically significant
Bovine pericardium and PTFE patches show no significant difference in clinical outcomes for VSD closure up to 5 years, though bovine pericardium may be preferred by surgeons for its handling characteristics.
May support bovine pericardium as alternative to PTFE for VSD closure; leaves open confirmation in prospective randomized trials.
This retrospective study compared the immediate post-operative (first month) and mid-term (up to 5 years post-operation) results of 22 patients with isolated ventricular septal defects who underwent surgical correction with bovine pericardium with 57 similar patients who received a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch. There were no cases of early (in the first month) mortality in either group and the 3-month post-operative echocardiographical studies showed no evidence of calcification or aneurysm formation around the patch. Recurrent ventricular septal defects due to dehiscence of the patch occurred in the early follow-up period in four patients who had the PTFE patch but this was not statistically significant. Annual echocardiographical examination revealed some calcification in both groups. We conclude that although there are no significant differences between the two materials in outcome after ventricular septal defects closure, we prefer bovine pericardium because of its handling characteristics, elasticity and the lower risk of endocarditis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Us et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Isolated ventricular septal defects (n=79). Bovine pericardium patch vs. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch was evaluated on Recurrent ventricular septal defects due to dehiscence (p=not statistically significant). Bovine pericardium patch for closure of ventricular septal defects showed no significant differences in outcomes compared to PTFE patch, with 0% vs 7.0% recurrent defects due to dehiscence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: