In recent decades, Central Asia has experienced significant changes in religious education and the formation of religious identity. The independence of regional states, social transformations, and globalization have created new challenges and opportunities for the development of Islamic education. This study aims to analyze contemporary trends, practices, and policy mechanisms regulating religious learning in Central Asian countries, including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan. A qualitative comparative document-based approach was employed, combining comparative analysis of curricula, thematic analysis of academic publications and legal documents, and assessment of the influence of state religious policies on educational institutions. Findings indicate that countries in the region actively balance the preservation of traditional Islamic education with the integration of secular educational standards. State initiatives play a crucial role in regulating religious instruction, implementing courses on secularism and ethics, and preparing qualified religious educators. At the same time, there is a notable increase in youth religious engagement, influenced by migration, international education programs, and exposure to global religious ideas. The study contributes to the literature by providing a comparative regional analysis of religious education across the five Central Asian republics and by offering a theological interpretation of the relationship between religious education, state regulation, and social development. The findings demonstrate that religious education functions not only as a mechanism for transmitting religious knowledge but also as a means of preserving cultural identity, strengthening social cohesion, and promoting ethical formation. The study further proposes policy and educational recommendations aimed at harmonizing religious and secular education, enhancing religious literacy, and supporting interfaith dialogue in the region. The results have practical implications for educators, researchers, policymakers, and international organizations engaged in religious education and social integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omorbaeva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: