Key result
Pacemaker use shows no clear benefit over unpaced management in complete heart block during pregnancy.
Why the study?
Complete heart block is an uncommon bradyarrhythmia complicating pregnancy that poses challenges to the treating team, and comprehensive data comparing outcomes with and without pacing were needed.
Does pacing improve maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with complete heart block compared to management without pacing?
Meta-Analysis (n=294)
Does pacing improve maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with complete heart block compared to management without pacing?
Pregnant women with complete heart block have low rates of adverse outcomes under multidisciplinary care, and outcomes are similar regardless of pacemaker use, suggesting physiological changes of pregnancy can be tolerated without pacing.
Supports multidisciplinary care of complete heart block in pregnancy without routine pacing; leaves open need for prospective trials on pacing indications.
Background Complete heart block (CHB) is an uncommon bradyarrhythmia complicating pregnancy, posing challenges to the treating team. Objective To evaluate the maternal outcomes, other cardiac complications, and pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with CHB and compare these outcomes among those managed with and without pacing. Methods We searched two databases, i.e., MEDLINE and EMBASE, for studies reporting outcomes in pregnancies complicated by CHB. The bibliography of relevant articles was examined to identify additional articles. Maternal and perinatal outcomes, including obstetric and cardiac complications, were extracted. Using the random-effects model, pooled estimates of various outcomes are reported as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 294 pregnancies among 220 women with CHB, identified from 12 studies, were included in the analysis. Two-thirds had either temporary or permanent pacing during pregnancy. Arrhythmias other than CHB were the most common cardiac complications noted (2.7%, 95% CI: 0.9%–4.5%). Lead-related complications, such as lead migration (1.6%, 95% CI: 0.1%–3.0%), were uncommon. One maternal death was reported among the included studies, during the postpartum period in an asymptomatic mother who did not have pacing. Low birth weight was the most common complication (43.1%, 95% CI: 17% - 67%) in the studies reporting neonatal outcomes. Conclusion Pregnancies complicated with CHB have low rates of adverse maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes under multidisciplinary care. The outcomes were similar among those with and without pacemakers, suggesting that women can cope with the physiological changes of pregnancy even without pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kottummal et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Complete heart block in pregnancy (n=294). Pacing (temporary or permanent) vs. No pacing was evaluated on Maternal and perinatal outcomes. Pregnancies complicated by complete heart block had low rates of adverse outcomes, which were similar between women managed with and without pacemakers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: