Key result
Peripheral ultrasound shows ~79% sensitivity but low specificity for detecting subclinical atherosclerosis versus cardiac CT.
Why the study?
The diagnostic accuracy of carotid and femoral ultrasound compared to cardiac computed tomography for detecting subclinical atherosclerosis in adults with familial hypercholesterolemia was uncertain.
Does peripheral ultrasound accurately detect subclinical atherosclerosis compared to cardiac computed tomography in adults with asymptomatic familial hypercholesterolemia?
Systematic Review
Does peripheral ultrasound accurately detect subclinical atherosclerosis compared to cardiac computed tomography in adults with asymptomatic familial hypercholesterolemia?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 78.9%, Specificity 32.0% (95% CI 51.5-93.0 (sensitivity), 14.0-57.6 (specificity))
Peripheral ultrasound has high sensitivity but low specificity compared to cardiac CT for detecting subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic familial hypercholesterolemia, suggesting it may be useful for triage but not as a replacement test.
May support triage but not CT replacement; leaves open prospective validation for risk reclassification in familial hypercholesterolemia.
BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia is characterized by lifelong exposure to high cholesterol levels and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Unequivocal atherosclerosis on imaging reclassifies patients from high to very high risk. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of carotid ultrasound and femoral ultrasound compared to cardiac computed tomography, for detecting subclinical atherosclerosis in adults with familial hypercholesterolemia with no history or symptoms of atherosclerotic disease. METHODS: Studies published in full length in English were identified through a bibliographic database search in eight databases and two trial registers supplemented with backward and forward citation (updated 14 August, 2026). Studies were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool and synthesized using a generalized linear mixed model. The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework, osf.io/89z4a. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review and three studies in the meta-analysis. Pooled prevalence estimates were 68.5% [62.2;74.5] for carotid plaques, 56.5% [48.3;64.5%] for femoral plaques, and a composite measure of coronary artery disease 46.2% [33.4;59.2]. Peripheral ultrasound demonstrated a high sensitivity of 78.9% [51.5;93.0] and low specificity of 32.0% [14.0;57.6]. CONCLUSIONS: A small amount of very low-quality evidence was identified highlighting the need for further studies to determine the best test-and-treat strategy for this patient group. The current evidence suggests that carotid and femoral ultrasound are unsuitable as replacement tests for cardiac computed tomography but could potentially play a role as triage test for risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ejlersen et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Familial hypercholesterolemia. Peripheral ultrasound (carotid and femoral) vs. Cardiac computed tomography was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for detecting subclinical atherosclerosis (Sensitivity 78.9%, Specificity 32.0%, 95% CI 51.5-93.0 (sensitivity), 14.0-57.6 (specificity)). Peripheral ultrasound demonstrated a high sensitivity of 78.9% (95% CI 51.5-93.0) and low specificity of 32.0% (95% CI 14.0-57.6) for detecting subclinical atherosclerosis compared to cardiac CT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: