Key result
Early rhythm control fails to improve CV outcomes and increases safety events in cancer-related AF.
Why the study?
The effectiveness and safety of early rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of cancer were unclear.
Does early rhythm control therapy improve cardiovascular outcomes and is it safe in patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of cancer?
RCT (n=2,779)
randomized
Yes
Does early rhythm control therapy improve cardiovascular outcomes and is it safe in patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of cancer?
While early rhythm control effectively maintains sinus rhythm in AF patients with a history of cancer, it may carry a higher risk of adverse safety events, highlighting the need for careful patient selection.
Early rhythm control may increase safety events in AF patients with cancer history; leaves open net benefit and requires dedicated trials.
Background and Aims Early rhythm-control improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Its effectiveness in patients with cancer is unclear. This study evaluated the effects of cancer history on early rhythm-control in the EAST-AFNET 4 trial. Methods This secondary analysis of EAST-AFNET 4 compared patients with and without a history of cancer, including active cancer and cancer in remission. Outcomes included the primary outcome, a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or hospitalization for worsening heart failure or acute coronary syndrome; the safety outcome, a composite of death, stroke, and serious adverse events related to rhythm-control; and rhythm at 24 months. Results Cancer history was available in 2779/2789 patients (99.6%). Cancer history was present in 216/2779 (7.8%; 19 with active cancer; mean age, 73 years; 95 [44%] women; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score, 3.5). During a follow-up to 8.6 years, early rhythm control reduced the primary outcome in patients with and without a history of cancer (pinteraction = .23) with high rates of sinus rhythm at 24 months (cancer: 84.9%, without cancer: 81.8%; pinteraction = .60). In patients with a cancer history, there was a signal for more safety outcomes with early rhythm control (early rhythm control 36/116 [31%] patients with event, 22 deaths; usual care 20/100 [20%] patients with event, 18 deaths; pinteraction = .055). Conclusions Early rhythm control therapy appears effective in patients with AF and a history of cancer but may be less safe than in patients without cancer, in this hypothesis-generating analysis. This could be play of chance but warrants further research into the safety and efficacy of rhythm control therapy in patients with a cancer history.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismaili et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation with and without a history of cancer (n=2,779). Early rhythm control therapy vs. Usual care was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or hospitalization for worsening heart failure or acute coronary syndrome (p=0.23). In patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of cancer, early rhythm control maintained sinus rhythm but was associated with a signal for more safety outcomes (31% vs 20%, p_interaction=0.055) compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: