Key result
Low day 3 penKid levels linked to ~135% greater likelihood of successful CRRT liberation.
Why the study?
Recent exploratory evidence from a monocentric trial suggested an association of plasma Proenkephalin A 119-159 with early and successful liberation from CRRT in critically ill AKI patients, requiring external validation in a multicenter cohort.
Does plasma Proenkephalin A 119-159 (penKid) level predict successful liberation from continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury?
Observational (n=369)
Yes
Does plasma Proenkephalin A 119-159 (penKid) level predict successful liberation from continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury?
Hazard Ratio: 2.35 (95% CI 1.45–3.81)
Absolute Event Rate: 63.3% vs 36.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Low penKid levels on day 3 of CRRT are associated with successful liberation from renal replacement therapy, though daily urinary output remains a stronger predictor.
May inform CRRT weaning decisions; leaves open whether penKid measurement improves outcomes in prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence suggests an association of plasma Proenkephalin A 119-159 (penKid) with early and successful liberation from continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. However, these exploratory results are derived from a monocentric trial and therefore require external validation in a multicenter cohort. METHODS: Data and plasma samples from the "Effect of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation versus Systemic Heparin Anticoagulation During Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy on Dialysis Filter Life Span and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury-A Randomized Clinical Trial" (RICH Trial) were used for this validation study. PenKid was measured in all plasma samples available at CRRT initiation and at day 3 of CRRT. Patients were categorized into low and high penKid groups with a cutoff at 100 pmol/l. Competing-risk time-to-event analyses were performed. Competing risk endpoints were successful and unsuccessful liberation from CRRT, the latter meaning death or initiation of a new RRT within one week of discontinuation of primary CRRT. Then penKid was compared to urinary output. RESULTS: Low pre-CRRT penKid levels at CRRT initiation were not associated with early and successful liberation from CRRT compared to patients with high pre-CRRT penKid levels [subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.01, 95% CI 0.73-1.40, p = 0.945]. However, the landmark analysis on day 3 of ongoing CRRT demonstrated an association between low penKid levels and successful liberation from CRRT (sHR 2.35, 95% CI 1.45-3.81, p < 0.001) and an association between high penKid levels and unsuccessful liberation (sHR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.80, p = 0.007). High daily urinary output (> 436 ml/d) was even stronger associated with successful liberation (sHR 2.91, 95% CI 1.80-4.73, p < 0.001) compared to penKid. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that penKid may be a competent biomarker to monitor the recovery of kidney function during CRRT. This is in line with previous findings and investigated this concept in a multicenter cohort. Again, low penKid was associated with early and successful CRRT liberation, but was outperformed by high daily urinary output. The findings of this study now warrant further evaluation in prospective studies or a randomized controlled trial. Trial registration The RICH Trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02669589. Registered 01 February 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Groote et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients (n=369). Low Proenkephalin A 119-159 (penKid) levels (≤ 100 pmol/l) at day 3 vs. High penKid levels (> 100 pmol/l) at day 3 was evaluated on Successful liberation from CRRT (survival without RRT for at least 7 days) (sHR 2.35, 95% CI 1.45-3.81, p=<0.001). Low penKid levels at day 3 of continuous renal replacement therapy were significantly associated with successful liberation from therapy compared to high levels (sHR 2.35).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: