Key result
Plasma PENK outperforms serum creatinine in predicting KRT liberation failure with ~90% specificity.
Why the study?
Utility of serum creatinine and urine output is limited for real-time assessment of kidney function and guiding KRT decisions in AKI, prompting evaluation of Proenkephalin A 119-159.
Does plasma PENK measurement improve the prediction of KRT liberation failure compared to serum creatinine in critically ill patients?
Observational (n=1,436)
No
Does plasma PENK measurement improve the prediction of KRT liberation failure compared to serum creatinine in critically ill patients?
Plasma PENK is a promising biomarker for assessing kidney integrity and predicting KRT liberation failure in critically ill patients, outperforming standard serum creatinine.
PENK may refine KRT liberation assessment beyond creatinine in ICU; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: Utility of serum creatinine (SCr) and urine output (UO) is limited for real-time assessments of functional integrity and guiding kidney replacement therapy (KRT) decisions in acute kidney injury (AKI). Proenkephalin A 119-159 (PENK) may overcome these limitations. We evaluate PENK's use for AKI staging, assessment of residual kidney function during KRT, and assessment of liberation failure. Methods: Prospective, real-world study in 1,436 critically ill patients at Heidelberg University Hospital, including a subgroup of 138 patients receiving KRT for liberation analyses. Plasma PENK was measured from admission to discharge. AKI was defined by KDIGO criteria; biomarker kinetic, ROC analyses and binary logistic regression models were performed. KRT liberation was considered successful if no re-initiation occurred within >5 days. Results: Of 1,436 patients, 621 (43.2%) developed AKI. Acute KRT was required in 12.6%, 40.9% of whom were successfully liberated, 24.3% failed, and 31.5% underwent no liberation attempt (3.3% lost to follow up). PENK rose with AKI stages and, unlike SCr/UO, distinguished stage 3 AKI with versus without acute KRT requirements, and differentiated acute from chronic KRT patients even under ongoing KRT. From KRT start, mean PENK levels increased progressively whereas SCr decreased under treatment. Later, PENK declined around successful liberation, with lower values compared to cases with liberation failure. PENK was the strongest, independent predictor of KRT liberation failure, outperforming SCr. A PENK cut-off of ≥250 pmol/L provided >90% specificity for liberation failure. Combining PENK and UO, further improved risk stratification. Conclusions: PENK may reflect kidney integrity independent of KRT, enhance residual kidney function assessment, and may aid prediction of KRT liberation failure, warranting multicenter validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabriel et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute kidney injury (n=1,436). Proenkephalin A 119-159 (PENK) vs. Serum creatinine and urine output was evaluated on Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) liberation failure. Plasma Proenkephalin A (PENK) independently predicted kidney replacement therapy liberation failure, outperforming serum creatinine, with a cut-off of ≥250 pmol/L providing >90% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: