Key result
Aspirin resistance linked to ~3-fold higher risk of death, MI, or CVA in stable CVD.
Why the study?
Little information existed linking the laboratory documentation of aspirin resistance with long-term clinical events.
Does aspirin resistance increase the risk of death, MI, or CVA in stable cardiovascular patients on aspirin?
Cohort (n=326)
Blinded
Does aspirin resistance increase the risk of death, MI, or CVA in stable cardiovascular patients on aspirin?
Hazard Ratio: 3.12 (95% CI 1.1–8.9)
Absolute Event Rate: 24% vs 10%
p-value: p=0.03
Aspirin resistance in stable cardiovascular patients is associated with a greater than threefold increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine if aspirin resistance is associated with clinical events. BACKGROUND: Aspirin resistance, defined by platelet function testing and presumed clinical unresponsiveness to aspirin, has been previously reported by our group and others. However, little information exists linking the laboratory documentation of aspirin resistance and long-term clinical events. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 326 stable cardiovascular patients from 1997 to 1999 on aspirin (325 mg/day for > or =7 days) and no other antiplatelet agents. We tested for aspirin sensitivity by optical platelet aggregation using adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA). The primary outcome was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Mean follow-up was 679 +/- 185 days. Aspirin resistance was defined as a mean aggregation of > or =70% with 10 microM ADP and > or =20% with 0.5 mg/ml AA. RESULTS: Of the patients studied, 17 (5.2%) were aspirin resistant and 309 (94.8%) were not aspirin resistant. During follow-up, aspirin resistance was associated with an increased risk of death, MI, or CVA compared with patients who were aspirin sensitive (24% vs. 10%, hazard ratio [HR] 3.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 8.90, p = 0.03). Stratified multivariate analyses identified platelet count, age, heart failure, and aspirin resistance to be independently associated with major adverse long-term outcomes (HR for aspirin resistance 4.14, 95% CI 1.42 to 12.06, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the natural history of aspirin resistance in a stable population, documenting a greater than threefold increase in the risk of major adverse events associated with aspirin resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gum et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=326). Aspirin resistance vs. Aspirin sensitivity was evaluated on Composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.10-8.90, p=0.03). Aspirin resistance in stable cardiovascular patients was associated with an increased risk of death, MI, or CVA compared with aspirin sensitivity (24% vs. 10%; HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.10-8.90, P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: