Key result
Novel mitral annulus segmentation algorithm matches expert accuracy within ~1.8 mm.
Why the study?
Methods to accurately and reproducibly delineate the mitral valve annulus shape from 3D ultrasound are limited.
Mean Difference: 1.81
p-value: p=0.85
The proposed graph cuts algorithm provides accurate, operator-independent segmentation of the mitral annulus from 3D ultrasound, performing comparably to expert manual delineation.
May streamline mitral annulus segmentation in research settings; leaves open clinical validation and adoption.
The shape of the mitral valve annulus is used in diagnostic and modeling applications, yet methods to accurately and reproducibly delineate the annulus are limited. This paper presents a mitral annulus segmentation algorithm designed for closed mitral valves which locates the annulus in three-dimensional ultrasound using only a single user-specified point near the center of the valve. The algorithm first constructs a surface at the location of the thin leaflets, and then locates the annulus by finding where the thin leaflet tissue meets the thicker heart wall. The algorithm iterates until convergence metrics are satisfied, resulting in an operator-independent mitral annulus segmentation. The accuracy of the algorithm was assessed from both a diagnostic and surgical standpoint by comparing the algorithm's results to delineations made by a group of experts on clinical ultrasound images of the mitral valve, and to delineations made by an expert with a surgical view of the mitral annulus on excised porcine hearts using an electromagnetically tracked pointer. In the former study, the algorithm was statistically indistinguishable from the best performing expert (p=0.85) and had an average RMS difference of 1.81+/-0.78 mm to the expert average. In the latter, the average RMS difference between the algorithm's annulus and the electromagnetically tracked points across six hearts was 1.19+/-0.17 mm .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schneider et al. (2010) studied Mitral valve annulus segmentation. Mitral annulus segmentation algorithm using graph cuts vs. Expert delineations was evaluated on Accuracy of segmentation (RMS difference) (RMS difference 1.81 mm, p=0.85). A novel mitral annulus segmentation algorithm was statistically indistinguishable from the best performing expert (p=0.85), with an average RMS difference of 1.81+/-0.78 mm to the expert average.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: