Key result
Early fetal heart assessment yields ~99% accuracy for detecting major CHDs in high-risk pregnancies.
Why the study?
The ability of standardized early fetal heart assessment to exclude major congenital heart defects in high-risk pregnancies was not well established.
Does standardized early fetal heart assessment accurately exclude major congenital heart defects in high-risk pregnancies at 11-14 weeks of gestation?
Observational (n=1,024)
No
Does standardized early fetal heart assessment accurately exclude major congenital heart defects in high-risk pregnancies at 11-14 weeks of gestation?
Standardized early fetal heart assessment at 11-14 weeks of gestation is highly accurate in excluding major congenital heart defects in high-risk populations.
May support early exclusion of major defects in high-risk pregnancies; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of standardized early fetal heart assessment (EFHA) that includes the 4-chamber view, outflow tract relationship (OTR), and transverse arches views (TAV) of the great arteries in excluding major congenital heart defects (CHDs) in high-risk populations. METHODS: This retrospective study included high-risk pregnancies for CHDs undergoing EFHA at 11-14 weeks of gestation. Risk factors for CHDs were diabetes mellitus, a family history of CHDs, a history of a CHD use of teratogenic medications, seizure disorder, assisted reproductive treatment-conceived pregnancy, presence of at least one of the ultrasound markers: enlarged nuchal translucency (>95th percentile), tricuspid regurgitation, and reversed a-wave in the ductus venosus, presence of an extracardiac or a suspected cardiac anomaly, a high-risk first trimester combined screen result, and multiple pregnancies. EFHA consisted of visualization of 4ChV, OTR, and TAV, with and without power Doppler ultrasound. The primary outcome was the negative predictive value of EFHA in excluding major CHDs. RESULTS: EFHA was performed on 1055 fetuses. Of these, 1024 were used for the final analysis. Of these, 94.9% (n = 923) were singleton. The most common indication for EFHA was maternal DM (n = 231, 22.6%). The sensitivity, specificity, false positive, false negative, and accuracy of EFHA were 93.2%, 99.9%, 1.4%, 0.4%, and 99.5% (P < .0001), respectively, in entire included cases. The performance of EFHA was 88%, 99.9%, 1.4%, 0.4%, and 99.5% (P < .0001) respectively when the terminated cases were excluded. CONCLUSION: Early fetal heart assessment is feasible for screening for major CHDs in high-risk populations. This approach may be expanded to the general obstetric population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turan et al. (2021) conducted an observational in High-risk pregnancies for major congenital heart defects (n=1,024). Standardized early fetal heart assessment (EFHA) was evaluated on Negative predictive value of EFHA in excluding major CHDs (p=<.0001). Standardized early fetal heart assessment in high-risk pregnancies demonstrated 93.2% sensitivity, 99.9% specificity, and 99.5% accuracy (P<.0001) for detecting major congenital heart defects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: