Key result
Early fetal echocardiography offers a feasible adjunct to mid-trimester scans for earlier CHD reassurance.
Why the study?
Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease remains essential for pregnancy management and transfer to specialized centers, with early fetal echocardiography becoming increasingly feasible and in demand.
Early fetal echocardiography is feasible and serves as a useful adjunct to mid-trimester imaging for providing earlier reassurance in high-risk pregnancies.
Supports earlier reassurance in high-risk pregnancies; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Fetal echocardiography remains the mainstay for diagnosis in those pregnancies identified to be at risk for congenital heart disease (CHD). Prenatal diagnosis of CHD remains essential to provide families with thorough pregnancy options as well as allow for transfer to facilities experienced in the management of pediatric cardiac disease in cases of ongoing pregnancy. First-trimester and early second-trimester fetal echocardiography is now feasible and will be increasingly in demand as enlarged nuchal translucency and first-trimester cystic hygroma are becoming common indications for early fetal echocardiography. Although the reported performance characteristics of early fetal echocardiography are good, the technique should be viewed as an adjunct to mid-trimester echocardiography, with its biggest benefit likely to be the ability to provide earlier reassurance to couples at risk for CHD. Early fetal echocardiograms should be reserved for patients at risk for CHD and be performed in centers experienced in this technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2007) conducted a review in Congenital heart disease (CHD). Early fetal echocardiography vs. Mid-trimester echocardiography was evaluated. Early fetal echocardiography is a feasible adjunct to mid-trimester echocardiography that provides earlier reassurance to couples at risk for congenital heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: