Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective cohort study demonstrates early interim PET/CT scans predict treatment outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, suggesting rapid scans enable timely risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: (18)F-FDG-PET/CT has been widely used in the staging of malignant lymphomas, and accepted as a tool for response assessment. Among PET parameters, the most frequently studied is maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Metabolic tumor burden (MTB) is a parameter in which both metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and tumor activity are integrated. Here, we analyzed the prognostic value of SUVmax, SUVsum (sum of the SUVmax), whole-body MTV (MTVwb) and MTBwb from baseline and interim PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with histologically proven DLBCL were imaged by PET/CT before treatment (Exam I), and one week after the first dose of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) therapy (Exam II). Biopsy specimens were examined by an expert hematopathologist, the Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) was estimated for each biopsy site from the MIB-1 stained sections. The response evaluation was performed after chemotherapy completion (6-8 cycles). RESULTS: All patients had one or more visualized lymphomatous lesions on (18)F-FDG-PET/CT. The SUVmax of the whole-body (BmSUVmax) was higher than the SUVmax at biopsy site (BxSUVmax) (mean: 20.1 vs. 17.3, p < 0.01). The PI correlated with the BxSUVmax (p < 0.05). One week after chemotherapy, SUVmax, SUVsum, MTVwb, and MTBwb decreased significantly (p < 0.01, respectively), SUVsum, MTVwb and MTBwb at Exam II correlated with chemotherapy response at treatment completion (p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: SUVmax is more accurate to detect tumor aggressiveness than biopsy in DLBCL, since BmSUVmax represents the most aggressive tumor of the patient. Interim PET/CT as early as one week after R-CHOP therapy predicts response. Thus, it could be used as a tool for guidance of risk stratification in DLBCL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: