Key result
Probucol linked to a reversible ~0.10 s QTc prolongation in a hypercholesterolemia case report.
Why the study?
Probucol is a cholesterol-lowering drug with previously unreported ECG abnormalities in humans, motivating investigation of its cardiac effects.
Does probucol cause QT-interval prolongation in patients with hypercholesterolemia?
Case Report (n=1)
Does probucol cause QT-interval prolongation in patients with hypercholesterolemia?
Probucol therapy for hypercholesterolemia may be associated with reversible QT-interval prolongation, a previously unreported side effect in humans.
Probucol linked to reversible QT prolongation in one case; leaves open arrhythmia risk and need for monitoring studies.
To the Editor. —Probucol (4,4′-[(1-methylethylidene) bis (thio)] bis [2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) phenol]) is a recently introduced drug for the lowering of serum cholesterol levels in familial hypercholesterolemia type II.1,2Side effects are considered slight, and no ECG abnormalities have been reported in humans receiving probucol.2,3This article describes a reversible QT-interval prolongation in a patient receiving probucol. Report of a Case. —A 65-year-old essentially well woman was receiving probucol, 500 mg twice a day, in February 1979 because of hypercholesterolemia (313 mg/dL). An ECG in 1976 was normal (QTcinterval, 0.38 s). When examined again in June 1979, she was asymptomatic. At that time, her cholesterol level was 230 mg/dL; an ECG was not taken. She was examined again on Dec 20, 1979, at which time the ECG (Figure) showed a QTc-interval prolongation (0.48 s). She was asked to stop taking probucol on Jan 3, 1980. A
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ludwig Klein (1981) conducted a case report in Hypercholesterolemia (n=1). Probucol was evaluated on QTc-interval prolongation. Probucol therapy was associated with a reversible QTc-interval prolongation (from 0.38 s to 0.48 s) in a 65-year-old woman treated for hypercholesterolemia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: