Key result
Enoxamed delivers comparable anti-Xa activity to Lovenox at four hours in ACS patients.
Why the study?
There is a critical need to ensure that generics of biologic medicines like enoxaparin are safe and effective due to the complexity of manufacturing biologics.
Does generic enoxaparin demonstrate comparable anti-Xa activity and clinical outcomes to originator enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
RCT (n=288)
Open blinded end-point
randomized-sequence
Yes
Does generic enoxaparin demonstrate comparable anti-Xa activity and clinical outcomes to originator enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
A Tunisian generic enoxaparin demonstrated comparable pharmacodynamic profiles and short-term clinical outcomes to the originator product in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports generic enoxaparin substitution in ACS; confirms bioequivalence in an RCT of acute patients.
Enoxaparin is a complex, biologically derived low-molecular-weight heparin.The manufacturing process for biologics is complex which makes difficult to obtain exact replicas of the reference biologic.This is why there is a critical need to ensure that generics of biologic medicines are safe and effective.This study was carried out to assess the comparability of a Tunisian generic enoxaparin (Enoxamed ® , Unimed Laboratory, Tunisia) with the originator product (Lovenox ® ; Sanofi US, Bridgewater, New Jersey) through non-clinical in vitro study in healthy volunteers and clinical studies (phases III and IV) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).For non-clinical study, blood from healthy volunteers was used to compare the effect of both formulations using anti-Xa activity and the thrombin generation test (TGT).All parameters of TGT were analyzed.For clinical studies, ACS patients were randomly assigned to receive Enoxamed ® (27 in phase III and 120 in phase IV) or Lovenox ® (23 in phase III and 118 in phase IV) and anti-Xa activity was measured 4 h thereafter.In healthy volunteers, the two products inhibited thrombin generation in a concentration-dependent manner.According to the profiles obtained from the TGT, Enoxamed ® had similar potency as Lovenox ® .In ACS patients, anti-Xa activity was found no difference between Enoxamed ® and Lovenox ® .No difference in major cardiovascular events was observed at 30 days after initial admission.Our finding combining anti-Xa activity and thrombin generation parameters would support the possibility to translate this biological efficacy to the clinical setting.The generic enoxaparin Enoxamed ® showed comparability and then the main regulatory criteria of bioequivalence with the originator product.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sassi et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Acute coronary syndrome (n=288). Enoxamed (generic enoxaparin) vs. Lovenox (originator enoxaparin) was evaluated on Anti-Xa activity at 4 hours (Phase IV) (p=0.71). Enoxamed demonstrated comparable anti-Xa activity to Lovenox at 4 hours post-dose (0.56 vs 0.55 IU/mL, p=0.71) in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: