Key result
CIMT measurement yields ~1-3% lower absolute MI risk and increased QALYs vs standard risk scoring.
Why the study?
The cost-effectiveness of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurements for primary prevention of coronary heart disease was previously unknown.
Does CIMT measurement improve cost-effectiveness and health outcomes in asymptomatic individuals aged 50-59 at intermediate or high CHD risk?
Population
Hypothetical cohort of men and women aged 50-59 years at intermediate or high CHD risk
Comparison
CIMT measurement for cardiovascular risk stratification vs standard risk stratification
Design
Markov model simulation based on Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study data
Follow-up
10 to 30 years
Authors
Loading...
May support long-term CIMT use for risk stratification in women; leaves open routine adoption pending prospective trials.
Does CIMT measurement improve cost-effectiveness and health outcomes in asymptomatic individuals aged 50-59 at intermediate or high CHD risk?
CIMT measurement for cardiovascular risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals aged 50-59 years is cost-effective over the long term, particularly for women.
Ruijter et al. (2013) studied Coronary heart disease. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurement was evaluated on Myocardial infarction (MI) events and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). CIMT measurements for cardiovascular risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals aged 50-59 years resulted in a 1-3% lower absolute risk of MI and increased QALYs over 20-30 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: