Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors, affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination. STUDY DESIGN: The sample consisted of 248 CBCT examinations in 190 patients video-recorded during examination. Three observers scored the videos; the patient moved or did not move. Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors were evaluated separately (chi-square test) and by multivariate regression analyses (patient movement and re-exposure as separate outcomes). RESULTS: The prevalence of movement was 21%. Cotton roll stabilizing patient's jaws, CBCT unit touching patient's hair, and patient's age 15 years or greater were related to movement. Age 15 years or greater had a significant impact on movement (P < .001; odds ratio [OR] 11.0). There were 16 re-exposures (6.4%). Age 15 years or greater, presence of a cotton roll, and field of view (FOV) were related to re-exposure. Use of a large FOV had significant impact on re-exposure (P = .04; OR 5.8). CONCLUSIONS: Operator-, examination-, and patient-related factors may affect patient movement and re-exposure in CBCT examination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spin‐Neto et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: