Key result
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is linked to a ~4-day shorter hospital stay versus open surgery.
Why the study?
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is widely used but not yet considered the gold standard, necessitating comparison of postoperative clinical and oncological outcomes with open surgery.
Does laparoscopic colorectal surgery improve postoperative clinical and oncological outcomes compared to open surgery in patients with colorectal cancer?
Cohort (n=526)
No
Does laparoscopic colorectal surgery improve postoperative clinical and oncological outcomes compared to open surgery in patients with colorectal cancer?
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery offers faster recovery, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stays compared to open surgery, without compromising short-term oncological outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery was associated with faster recovery; leaves open long-term oncological equivalence in colorectal cancer.
Objectives: Laparoscopic approach is nowadays being used widely for the treatment of various surgical diseases in many centers, but it has not considered as the gold standard in colorectal surgery yet.The aim of this study was to examine and compare the postoperative clinical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in the light of literatüre. Methods: 526 patients who had colorectal cancer surgery in our clinic in between May 2015 and March 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective comparative study. Patients treated with open surgery were included in Group 1 (OS group) and ones treated laparoscopically includedin Group 2 (LS group). Demographics (age,sex), types of operations, ASA scores, evaluation of resected specimen, dissected lymph nodes, T invasion of tumors in groups, postoperative complications, operation time and hospital stay times and short-term morbidity and mortality were noted and compared with each other. Results: Patients in LS group had less blood loss compared with those in OS group (median 80 mL (range 0-1300) vs 155 mL (0–2000),p<0•0001), although laparoscopic surgery lasted longer than did open surgery (p<0•0001). The patients who underwent the laparoscopic surgery showed faster recovery then those who underwent open surgery, regarding first passing bowel gas (p=0.045), time of first bowel motion (p=0.04), time to resume normal diet (p=0.041), and time to ambulate independently (p=0.037). Hospital stay time was significantly shorter in Laparoscopy group (p<0.001). Oncological satisfaction of resection as assessed by number of removed lymph nodes, distal resection margin did not differ between groups (p=0.564, p=0.698). Although wound infection was significantly higher in OS group (p<0.001), other morbidity parameters and mortality after colectomy did not differ between two groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery gives satisfactory outcomes as compared to open surgery in many aspects such as clinical and oncological outcomes and early recovery. Considering the short-term outcomes of the present study, laparoscopic colorectal surgery in experienced hands seems to be safe and feasible for the treatment of the colorectal cancers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2023 study conducted a cohort in Colorectal cancer (n=526). Laparoscopic colorectal surgery vs. Open colorectal surgery was evaluated on Hospital stay time (days) (p=<0.001). Laparoscopic colorectal surgery reduced mean hospital stay time compared to open surgery, alongside less blood loss and fewer wound infections.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: