Key result
Pharyngeal packing reduces perioperative antral cross-sectional area increase ~68% vs no packing during nasal surgery.
Why the study?
Pharyngeal packing is commonly used to reduce perioperative blood ingestion and postoperative nausea and vomiting in nasal surgery, but its effect on perioperative gastric volume was unclear.
Does pharyngeal packing reduce perioperative gastric volume and PONV in patients undergoing elective nasal surgery?
RCT (n=88)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Does pharyngeal packing reduce perioperative gastric volume and PONV in patients undergoing elective nasal surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 58.56% vs 183.11%
p-value: p=0.004
Pharyngeal packing reduces the increase in perioperative gastric volume due to perioperative blood ingestion in elective nasal surgery, potentially reducing the risk of pulmonary aspiration.
Pharyngeal packing may curb gastric volume rise and aspiration risk in nasal surgery; leaves open confirmation in larger trials before practice change.
Background: Pharyngeal packing (PP) is commonly performed to reduce the incidence of perioperative blood ingestion (PBI) in nasal surgery (NS), and thus the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study examined the effects of PP on the perioperative gastric volume (GV) and PONV in patients undergoing NS, by ultrasound assessment. Methods: Patients undergoing elective NS [septoplasty, septo-rhinoplasty (SRP) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)] were randomised to receive or not receive PP. In the PP group, pharyngeal packs were placed after the orotracheal intubation. Ultrasound assessments were performed for all patients preoperatively (before the anaesthesia induction) and postoperatively (before the extubation). The antero-posterior (AP) and cranio-caudal (CC) antral diameters, antral cross-sectional area (ACSA), and total GV were calculated. PONV incidence and severity were rated. These variables were compared between timepoints and groups, and in the subgroup analyses according to the surgery type. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to assess correlations between the variables. Results: AP and CC diameters and ACSAs were greater postoperatively than preoperatively in the PP and non-PP groups (n = 44 each; all p < 0.05). Postoperative AP and CC diameters and the ACSA were greater in the non-PP than in the PP group (all p < 0.05). Postoperative AP diameters were greater than preoperatively in patients undergoing SRP and FESS, and the postoperative CC diameter and ACSA were greater than preoperatively in patients undergoing SRP (all p < 0.05). Surgery duration was correlated positively with postoperative AP diameter (r = 0.380, p < 0.05), CC diameter (r = 0.291, p < 0.05), and ACSA (r = 0.369, p < 0.05). Patients who underwent septoplasty surgery, PP was decreased PONV incidence and severity at the first four hours, postoperatively (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The study findings indicate that PP reduces the increase in the perioperative GV due to PBI in an elective NS. It is therefore a useful and safe means of reducing the risk of perioperative pulmonary aspiration in such surgeries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Temel et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Elective nasal surgery (n=88). Pharyngeal packing vs. No pharyngeal packing was evaluated on Pre-to-postoperative difference in antral cross-sectional area (ACSA) in mm2 (p=0.004). Pharyngeal packing significantly reduced the perioperative increase in antral cross-sectional area compared to no packing (58.56 vs 183.11 mm2, p=0.004) during elective nasal surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: