Key result
MRI-derived ventricular-vascular coupling ratios correlate modestly, estimating biventricular interaction better than EF.
Why the study?
Ventriculo-ventricular interactions in congenital heart disease are known but not well quantified, and MRI-derived ventricular-vascular coupling ratio may provide better insight.
Does MRI-derived ventricular-vascular coupling ratio provide a better estimate of ventriculo-ventricular interaction compared to echocardiography in children with congenital heart disease?
Observational (n=55)
No
Does MRI-derived ventricular-vascular coupling ratio provide a better estimate of ventriculo-ventricular interaction compared to echocardiography in children with congenital heart disease?
MRI-derived biventricular ventricular-vascular coupling ratio provides a stronger estimate of ventriculo-ventricular interaction than traditional parameters in children with congenital heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MRI biventricular VVCR may better quantify ventriculo-ventricular interaction than EF or echo in pediatric CHD; leaves open clinical adoption pending validation.
BACKGROUND: Ventriculo-ventricular interactions are known to exist, though not well quantified. We hypothesised that the ventricular-vascular coupling ratio assessed by cardiovascular MRI would provide insight into this relationship. We also sought to compare MRI-derived ventricular-vascular coupling ratio to echocardiography and patient outcomes. METHODS: Children with cardiac disease and biventricular physiology were included. Sanz's and Bullet methods were used to calculate ventricular-vascular coupling ratio by MRI and echocardiography, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed for right and left heart diseases. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed to determine associations with outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (age 14.3 ± 2.5 years) were included. Biventricular ventricular-vascular coupling ratio by MRI correlated with each other (r = 0.41; p = 0.003), with respect to ventricle's ejection fraction (r = -0.76 to -0.88; p < 0.001) and other ventricle's ejection fraction (r = -0.42 to -0.47; p < 0.01). However, biventricular ejection fraction had only weak correlation with each other (r = 0.31; p = 0.02). Echo underestimated ventricular-vascular coupling ratio for the left ventricle (p < 0.001) with modest correlation to MRI-derived ventricular-vascular coupling ratio (r = 0.43; p = 0.002). There seems to be a weak correlation between uncoupled right ventricular-vascular coupling ratio with the need for intervention and performance on exercise testing (r = 0.33; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: MRI-derived biventricular ventricular-vascular coupling ratio provides a better estimate of ventriculo-ventricular interaction in children and adolescents with CHD. These associations are stronger than traditional parameters and applicable to right and left heart conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Congenital heart disease with biventricular physiology (n=55). MRI-derived ventricular-vascular coupling ratio vs. Echocardiography-derived ventricular-vascular coupling ratio and traditional parameters was evaluated on Correlation between MRI-derived ventricular-vascular coupling ratio of the right and left ventricles (r = 0.41, p=0.003). MRI-derived biventricular ventricular-vascular coupling ratios for the right and left ventricles demonstrated a modest correlation, providing a better estimate of ventriculo-ventricular interaction than traditional ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: