Key result
Elite swimming level is linked to ~110% higher performance instability versus good-level swimmers.
Why the study?
The role of velocity variability in backstroke swimming performance and its association with swimmer level was not well understood.
Cross-Sectional (n=31)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.1742% vs 0.0831%
p-value: p=<0.001
Elite backstroke swimmers exhibit greater velocity instability and complexity compared to good-level swimmers, suggesting functional variability aids performance.
May indicate adaptive variability in elite backstroke; leaves open whether training to increase instability improves performance.
Backstroke swimming, a cyclic and continuous movement, displays a repeating structure due to the repeated action of the limb, presenting similar (but not identical) cycles. Some variability is generated by instabilities, but this may play a functional role in the human performance, allowing individual adaptations to constraints. The current study examined the role of velocity variability in backstroke performance, hypothesizing that this variable is associated with swimmers’ performance. Sixteen elite and fifteen good-level swimmers were video recorded in the sagittal plane when performing 25 m backstroke at maximal intensity in order to determine hip velocity and mean velocity, stroke rate, stroke length and indexes of coordination/synchronization. Lyapunov maximal exponent and sample entropy were also calculated for successive cycles. The elite swimmers’ performances were more unstable (0.1742 ± 0.1131 versus 0.0831 ± 0.0042, p < 0.001) and complex (0.9222 ± 0.4559 versus 0.3821 ± 0.3096, p < 0.001) than their good-level counterparts, but intracycle velocity variation did not differ (11.98 ± 3.47 versus 12.03 ± 3.16%, p > 0.05). Direct relationships were observed between mean velocity and stability (r = 0.40, p = 0.03), as well as with complexity (r = 0.53, p = 0.002), with intracycle velocity variation and complexity also being related (r = 0.38, p = 0.04). Backstroke performance is associated with velocity variability, with elite swimmers being able to control it through several adaptations, overcoming the high drag and inertia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernandes et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy swimmers (n=31). Elite swimming level vs. Good-level swimmers was evaluated on Instability (Lyapunov maximal exponent) during successive cycles (p=<0.001). Elite swimming level was associated with significantly higher performance instability (0.1742 vs 0.0831, p<0.001) and complexity (0.9222 vs 0.3821, p<0.001) compared to good-level swimmers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: