Key result
A refined paper-based ICU readmission checklist yields low compliance and a ~22% unplanned readmission rate.
Why the study?
Readmission prevention checklists may improve patient care and reduce medical costs, but prior pilot showed low compliance despite zero readmissions.
Does a refined readmission prevention checklist improve compliance and reduce unplanned ICU readmissions in medical and surgical ICU patients?
Observational
No
Does a refined readmission prevention checklist improve compliance and reduce unplanned ICU readmissions in medical and surgical ICU patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Implementing a paper-based ICU readmission prevention checklist in an electronic medical environment resulted in very low compliance and failed to prevent readmissions.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Checklists have been adopted by various institutions to improve patient outcomes. In particular, readmission prevention checklists may be of potential value to improve patient care and reduce medical costs. As a result, a prior quality improvement study was conducted to create an intensive care unit readmission prevention checklist. The previous pilot demonstrated zero readmissions when the readmission prevention checklist was utilized but yielded low compliance (30%). Thus, a subsequent quality initiative was undertaken to refine the readmission prevention checklist with the primary aim of improved compliance while maintaining a reduced readmission rate that was observed with the original quality improvement study. METHOD: A single-centre, cross-sectional study for assessing baseline data and a prospective observational study to assess the effectiveness of a refined readmission prevention checklist tool in a 20-bed tertiary medical-surgical intensive care unit at an academic medical centre in Rochester, MN was conducted. Medical patients admitted through the emergency department, upon direct transfer from outside facility, and post-operative surgical patients at our institution were included. A refined readmission prevention checklist tool was administered during an 8-week pilot period for medical and post-operative surgical patients. RESULTS: The refined readmission prevention checklist resulted in an even lower compliance (10.5%) from the initial phase likely resulting from utilization of a paper readmission prevention checklist in an electronic medical environment. Moreover, the refined readmission prevention checklist demonstrated a 22% unplanned readmission rate for patients in which the tool was utilized. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the findings of the current quality improvement study may serve to rethink the process of health care delivery that applies paper tools in an electronic medical environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smischney et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Intensive care unit readmission. Refined readmission prevention checklist was evaluated on Unplanned readmission rate. A refined paper-based ICU readmission prevention checklist resulted in low compliance and a 22% unplanned readmission rate among patients for whom the tool was utilized.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: