This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: To measure changes in the proportion of medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients prescribed pharmacologic stress ulcer prophylaxis therapy over a 4-year period in relation to the incidence of stress-related ulceration detected by endoscopy at our institution. DESIGN: Retrospective 4-year review of pharmacy and endoscopy databases. SETTING: A 35-bed MICU. PATIENTS: Patients (n = 2941) admitted to the MICU for longer than 24 hours, between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 1996, without acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage on admission. METHODS: Records were reviewed to identify patients prescribed pharmacologic stress ulcer prophylaxis (> 24 h of sucralfate or a histamine2-receptor antagonist [H2RA]), and patients with evidence of stress ulceration during endoscopy. RESULTS: The number of patients per year receiving stress ulcer prophylaxis significantly (p < 0.001) decreased between 1993 and 1996: 1993, 492/693 (71%); 1994, 478/798 (60%); 1995, 295/670 (44%); 1996, 164/780 (21%). There was no difference between years in the median duration of stress ulcer prophylaxis therapy or the proportion of patients receiving sucralfate versus H2RA therapy. There was no difference (p = 0.91) between years in the annual incidence of definite or possible stress-related ulceration: 1993, 6/693 (0.87%); 1994, 5/798 (0.63%); 1995, 6/670 (0.90%); 1996, 5/780 (0.64%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of endoscopically proven stress-related ulceration has remained unchanged over the past 4 years in our MICU despite significantly fewer patients receiving pharmacologic stress ulcer prophylaxis therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Devlin et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: